Ten questions to consider when interpreting results of a meta‐epidemiological study—the MetaBLIND study as a case
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Sterne,et al. Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study , 2020, BMJ.
[2] J. Higgins,et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.
[3] J. Sterne. Commentary: does the selective inversion approach demonstrate bias in the results of studies using routinely collected data? , 2018, British Medical Journal.
[4] M. Page,et al. Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review , 2018, BMJ Open.
[5] P. Tugwell,et al. Some Cochrane risk-of-bias items are not important in osteoarthritis trials: a meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[6] Julian P T Higgins,et al. Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study , 2017, American journal of epidemiology.
[7] Zhen Wang,et al. Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research , 2017, Evidence-Based Medicine.
[8] J. Higgins,et al. Label‐invariant models for the analysis of meta‐epidemiological data , 2017, Statistics in medicine.
[9] L. Borges,et al. Understanding Meta-Epidemiological Studies , 2016 .
[10] Jelena Savović,et al. Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies , 2016, PloS one.
[11] Julian P T Higgins,et al. Sample size calculation for meta‐epidemiological studies , 2016, Statistics in medicine.
[12] Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,et al. Lack of blinding of outcome assessors in animal model experiments implies risk of observer bias. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[13] Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen,et al. Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies. , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.
[14] J. Hilden,et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.
[15] G. Gyte,et al. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[16] L. Trinquart,et al. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[17] J. Hilden,et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors , 2013, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[18] Ross J. Harris,et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. , 2012, Health technology assessment.
[19] Ethan M Balk,et al. Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[20] G. Guyatt,et al. Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[21] Isabelle Boutron,et al. Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[22] Isabelle Boutron,et al. Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[23] I. Boutron,et al. Blinding in Randomized Clinical Trials: Imposed Impartiality , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.
[24] Isabelle Boutron,et al. Single-Center Trials Show Larger Treatment Effects Than Multicenter Trials: Evidence From a Meta-epidemiologic Study , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[25] K. Dickersin,et al. Metabias: A Challenge for Comparative Effectiveness Research , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[26] Michele Tarsilla. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.
[27] D. Altman,et al. The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: a meta-epidemiologic study. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[28] P. Seed,et al. Effect of food intake during labour on obstetric outcome: randomised controlled trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[29] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Models for potentially biased evidence in meta‐analysis using empirically based priors , 2009 .
[30] J. Hilden,et al. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.
[31] Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,et al. Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors , 2006, Clinical trials.
[32] E. Hodnett,et al. The effect of unrestricted oral carbohydrate intake on labor progress. , 2005, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.
[33] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[34] Douglas G Altman,et al. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[35] Ethan M Balk,et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 2002, JAMA.
[36] S. Cessie,et al. A double‐blind, randomised, placebo controlled study on the influence of carbohydrate solution intake during labour , 2002, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[37] P. Seed,et al. An evaluation of isotonic "sport drinks" during labor. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[38] Christian Gluud,et al. Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[39] G. Guyatt,et al. Physician interpretations and textbook definitions of blinding terminology in randomized controlled trials. , 2001, JAMA.
[40] P. Seed,et al. Eating in labour. A randomised controlled trial assessing the risks and benefits , 1999, Anaesthesia.
[41] D. Cook,et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.
[42] D J Torgerson,et al. Pragmatic trials: lab meets bedside , 2019, The British journal of dermatology.
[43] R. J. Hayes,et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.
[44] J D Emerson,et al. An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.
[45] A. B. Hill. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[46] Ross J. Harris,et al. Correction: reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.
[47] J. Sterne,et al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. , 2003, Health technology assessment.
[48] M. Dufour,et al. Epidemiology. Introduction. , 1995, Recent developments in alcoholism : an official publication of the American Medical Society on Alcoholism, the Research Society on Alcoholism, and the National Council on Alcoholism.