An Evaluation of a 3 D Multimodal Marker-Less Motion Analysis System

Motion analysis is a technique used by clinicians (among many others) that quantifies human movement by using camera-based systems. Marker-based motion analysis systems have been used across a variety of application domains, from Interactive 3D TeleImmersion (i3DTI) environments to the diagnosis of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal diseases. Although such analysis is performed in several laboratories in many countries, numerous issues exist: (1) the high cost of precise motion capture systems; (2) scarcity of qualified personnel to operate them; (3) expertise required to interpret their results; (4) space requirements to install and store these systems; (5) complexity in terms of measurement protocol required for such systems; (6) limited availability; (7) and in some situations the use of markers means they are unsuitability for certain clinical use cases (e.g. for patients recovering from orthopaedic surgery). In this paper, we present, from a system perspective, an alternative, cheaper, and more accessible system for motion analysis. The ultimate aim is to use the output of this multimodal marker-less system as part of an immersive multimedia gait re-education tool. In real-time, it will advise the user on their gait performance (as well as potentially providing accurate clinical data to clinicians). With the initial focus on the capture system, we have developed and evaluated a novel multimodal system which integrates Multiple Microsoft Kinects (which employ RGB-D cameras) with multiple Shimmer Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors. We have compared this system with the VICON system (the gold standard in motion capture). Our marker-less motion capture system combines data from 4 skeletons generating 3D and complete 360 degrees in view skeleton. The system combines unit quaternions from each Kinect joint with quaternions from 4 inertial measurement units to promote integration. We used our system to measure 3D points of 12 joints from the Kinect fused skeleton and flexion-extension angles of the knee and hip in a walking trial in 8 participants with 8-10 trials per participant. The analysis found component similarity of 0.97 for knee angles and 0.98 for hip angles. These results show that our system, through combination of Multi Kinect system and Shimmer IMUs, offers a cheaper, sufficiently accurate and more accessible human motion analysis system.

[1]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[2]  Richard D. Keane,et al.  Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images , 1992 .

[3]  Rashid Ansari,et al.  Multimodal human discourse: gesture and speech , 2002, TCHI.

[4]  Stefano Corazza,et al.  A new era in the capture of human movement; markerless capture of human movement , 2006 .

[5]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[6]  H. Abdi,et al.  Principal component analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Gazihan Alankus,et al.  Towards customizable games for stroke rehabilitation , 2010, CHI.

[8]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Joint angle estimation in rehabilitation with inertial sensors and its integration with Kinect , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Sebastian Madgwick,et al.  Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[10]  N. Lane,et al.  Risk factors for incident osteoarthritis of the hip and knee , 2011, Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine.

[11]  Cristina Videira Lopes,et al.  Monitoring Intake Gestures using Sensor Fusion (Microsoft Kinect and Inertial Sensors) for Smart Hom , 2012 .

[12]  Ansgar Schwirtz,et al.  Reliability and accuracy in three-dimensional gait analysis: a comparison of two lower body protocols. , 2013, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[13]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  Fusing Kinect sensor and inertial sensors with multi-rate Kalman filter , 2014 .

[14]  Jonathan Wheat,et al.  The accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect in joint angle measurement , 2014 .

[15]  Alexandre G. Szykman,et al.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Low Cost Motion Capture Systems , 2014 .

[16]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  Fusion of Inertial and Depth Sensor Data for Robust Hand Gesture Recognition , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[17]  Alexandra Pfister,et al.  Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis , 2014, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[18]  Jie Li,et al.  Real-Time Human Motion Capture Driven by a Wireless Sensor Network , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Games Technol..

[19]  Melvyn Roerdink,et al.  Kinematic Validation of a Multi-Kinect v2 Instrumented 10-Meter Walkway for Quantitative Gait Assessments , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Patric Eichelberger,et al.  Analysis of accuracy in optical motion capture - A protocol for laboratory setup evaluation. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Julius Verrel,et al.  Accuracy and Reliability of the Kinect Version 2 for Clinical Measurement of Motor Function , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  W Singhose A Comparison of Dual-Kinect and Vicon Tracking of Human Motion for Use in Robotic Motion Programming , 2017, ICRA 2017.

[23]  Hans Kainz,et al.  Reliability of four models for clinical gait analysis. , 2017, Gait & posture.