Assessment and Localization of Structural Damage in r/c Structures through Intelligent Seismic Signal Processing

ABSTRACT In this work, a novel approach in post-earthquake structural damage estimation is investigated. The approach is formulated as a problem of both damage approximation and localization. The inter-story drift ratio and the global damage index of Park/Ang (DIG,PA) are the estimated damage indicators for each floor of the structure. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), random forests (RFs), support vector machines (SVMs) with linear and radial basis function (RBF) kernels and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) are tested to predict the seismic damage state of each floor of an 8-storey reinforced concrete (r/c) building subjected to 155 natural and artificially generated seismic accelerograms. The damage potential of the accelerograms is described by three seismic parameters extracted from the response of the structure. The set of seismic accelerograms is defined by combining two outlier detection techniques, isolation forests and Z-score, while the set of seismic parameters is confirmed by minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection algorithm. Optimization methods are used to fine-tune the performance of all networks. Results indicate RFs and ANNs among the models with optimal performances, reaching average correct classification rates of up to 96.87% and 91.87% with RFs, and 96.25% and 90.12% with ANNs, for DIG,PA and ISDR, respectively.

[1]  K Meskouris,et al.  Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures , 2001 .

[2]  Petros-Fotios Alvanitopoulos,et al.  Synthesis of artificial spectrum-compatible seismic accelerograms , 2014 .

[3]  Nuno Mendes,et al.  Multiscale Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofit of Existing Masonry Buildings , 2019, Buildings.

[4]  Filippo Ubertini,et al.  Automated crack detection in conductive smart-concrete structures using a resistor mesh model , 2018 .

[5]  Petros-Fotios Alvanitopoulos,et al.  Structural damage estimation in mid-rise reinforced concrete structure based on time–frequency analysis of seismic accelerograms , 2016 .

[6]  Yoshiaki Hisada,et al.  Application of an earthquake early warning system and a real-time strong motion monitoring system in emergency response in a high-rise building , 2011 .

[7]  Ioannis Andreadis,et al.  Intelligent Seismic Acceleration Signal Processing for Damage Classification in Buildings , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Matthieu Perrault,et al.  Correlation between Ground Motion and Building Response using California Earthquake Records , 2015 .

[9]  Dixiong Yang,et al.  Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault ground motions based on generalized drift spectral analysis , 2010 .

[10]  A. Arias A measure of earthquake intensity , 1970 .

[11]  Andreas J. Kappos An overview of the development of the hybrid method for seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings , 2016 .

[12]  Ioannis Andreadis,et al.  Classification of Seismic Damages in Buildings Using Fuzzy Logic Procedures , 2013 .

[13]  Ye Xia,et al.  Vibration-Based Seismic Damage States Evaluation for Regional Concrete Beam Bridges Using Random Forest Method , 2020, Sustainability.

[14]  A. G. Brady,et al.  A STUDY ON THE DURATION OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1975 .

[15]  Mohammad Masoud Javidi,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy feature selection algorithm for high-dimensional regression problems: An mRMR-based framework , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  Approaches to the rapid seismic damage prediction of r/c buildings using artificial neural networks , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[17]  Samir Omanovic,et al.  GA-ANFIS Expert System Prototype for Prediction of Dermatological Diseases , 2015, MIE.

[18]  C. M. Wen,et al.  A neural network approach for structural identification and diagnosis of a building from seismic response data , 2003 .

[19]  Ioannis Andreadis,et al.  Fuzzy system for seismic signal classification , 2006 .

[20]  Qiujun Huang,et al.  An improved grid search algorithm of SVR parameters optimization , 2012, 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on Communication Technology.

[21]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[22]  Pritam Hait,et al.  Seismic damage assessment and prediction using artificial neural network of RC building considering irregularities , 2020 .

[23]  S. Masri,et al.  Application of Neural Networks for Detection of Changes in Nonlinear Systems , 2000 .

[24]  Petros-Fotios Alvanitopoulos,et al.  Intelligent Systems for Structural Damage Assessment , 2018, J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[26]  Fernando De la Torre,et al.  Optimal feature selection for support vector machines , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  Comparative evaluation of MFP and RBF neural networks’ ability for instant estimation of r/c buildings’ seismic damage level , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[28]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  Seismic parameters' combinations for the optimum prediction of the damage state of R/C buildings using neural networks , 2017, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[29]  Vojko Kilar,et al.  Resilience assessment of complex urban systems to natural disasters: A new literature review , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[30]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  Isolation Forest , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[31]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Response‐based damage assessment of structures , 1999 .

[32]  Tzu-Kang Lin,et al.  Real-time seismic structural response prediction system based on support vector machine , 2020 .

[33]  Mia Hubert,et al.  Robust statistics for outlier detection , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[34]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.