Ecotoxicological assessment of grey water treatment systems with Daphnia magna and Chironomus riparius.

In order to meet environmental quality criteria, grey water was treated in four different ways: 1) aerobic 2) anaerobic+aerobic 3) aerobic+activated carbon 4) aerobic+ozone. Since each treatment has its own specific advantages and disadvantages, the aim of this study was to compare the ecotoxicity of differently treated grey water using Chironomus riparius (96 h test) and Daphnia magna (48 h and 21d test) as test organisms. Grey water exhibited acute toxicity to both test organisms. The aerobic and combined anaerobic+aerobic treatment eliminated mortality in the acute tests, but growth of C. riparius was still affected by these two effluents. Post-treatment by ozone and activated carbon completely removed the acute toxicity from grey water. In the chronic toxicity test the combined anaerobic+aerobic treatment strongly affected D. magna population growth rate (47%), while the aerobic treatment had a small (9%) but significant effect. Hence, aerobic treatment is the best option for biological treatment of grey water, removing most of the toxic effects of grey water. If advanced treatment is required, the treatment with either ozone or GAC were shown to be very effective in complete removal of toxicity from grey water.

[1]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Comparison of Three Systems for Biological Greywater Treatment , 2010 .

[2]  H Temmink,et al.  Characterisation and biological treatment of greywater. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  J. Postma,et al.  Chronic toxicity of cadmium to Chironomus riparius (Diptera: Chironomidae) at different food levels , 1994, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[4]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Influence of food limitation on the effects of fenvalerate pulse exposure on the life history and population growth rate of Daphnia magna , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Characterization and anaerobic biodegradability of grey water , 2011 .

[6]  A. Hendriks,et al.  Monitoring response of XAD-concentrated water in the rhine delta : a major part of the toxic compounds remains unidentified , 1994 .

[7]  T. Ternes,et al.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change? , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  L. H. Leal.  Removal of micropollutants from grey water : combining biological and physical/chemical processes , 2010 .

[9]  C. Buisman,et al.  Occurrence of xenobiotics in gray water and removal in three biological treatment systems. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  L. A. Ghunmi.  Characterization and treatment of grey water; options for (re)use. , 2009 .

[11]  P. Voogt,et al.  Toxic and Genotoxic Effects of Azaarenes: Isomers and Metabolites , 1999 .

[12]  A Joss,et al.  Are we about to upgrade wastewater treatment for removing organic micropollutants? , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Dynamics of metal adaptation in riverine chironomids. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[14]  A. Fernández-Alba,et al.  Occurrence of emerging pollutants in urban wastewater and their removal through biological treatment followed by ozonation. , 2010, Water research.

[15]  C. Buisman,et al.  Removal of micropollutants from aerobically treated grey water via ozone and activated carbon. , 2011, Water research.

[16]  Ralf Otterpohl,et al.  Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .