What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain.

Amblyopia results in a loss of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and position acuity. However, the nature of the neural losses is not yet fully understood. Here we report the results of experiments using noise to try to better understand the losses in amblyopia. Specifically, in one experiment we compared the performance of normal, amblyopic, and ideal observers for detecting a localized signal (a discrete frequency pattern or DFP) in fixed contrast white noise. In a second experiment, we used visibility-scaled noise and varied both the visibility of the noise (from 2 to 20 times the noise detection threshold) and the spatial frequency of the signal. Our results show a loss of efficiency for detection of known signals in noise that increases with the spatial frequency of the signal in observers with amblyopia. To determine whether the loss of efficiency was a consequence of a mismatched template, we derived classification images. We found that although the amblyopic observers' template was shifted to lower spatial frequencies, the shift was insufficient to account for their threshold elevation. Reduced efficiency in the amblyopic visual system may reflect a high level of internal noise, a poorly matched position template, or both. To analyze the type of internal noise we used an "N-pass" technique, in which observers performed the identical experiment N times (where N = 3 or 4). The amount of disagreement between the repeated trials enables us to parse the internal noise into random noise and consistent noise beyond that due to the poorly matched template. Our results show that the amblyopes' reduced efficiency for detecting signals in noise is explained in part by reduced template efficiency but to a greater extent by increased random internal noise. This loss is more or less independent of external noise contrast over a log unit range of external noise.

[1]  B. Dosher,et al.  MECHANISMS OF PERCEPTUAL LEARNING. , 2009, Learning & perception.

[2]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The response of the amblyopic visual system to noise , 2007, Vision Research.

[3]  Pengjing Xu,et al.  Identify mechanisms of amblyopia in Gabor orientation identification with external noise , 2006, Vision Research.

[4]  D. Levi,et al.  Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint , 2006, Vision Research.

[5]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Visual Processing in Amblyopia: Human Studies , 2006, Strabismus.

[6]  L. Kiorpes Visual Processing in Amblyopia: Animal Studies , 2006, Strabismus.

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  What is the signal in noise? , 2005, Vision Research.

[8]  Bosco S. Tjan,et al.  Learning letter identification in peripheral vision , 2005, Vision Research.

[9]  Denis G Pelli,et al.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[10]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[11]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Noise Provides Some New Signals About the Spatial Vision of Amblyopes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Klein,et al.  Facilitation of contrast detection by cross-oriented surround stimuli and its psychophysical mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[13]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Correlated binocular activity guides recovery from monocular deprivation , 2002, Nature.

[14]  P. Bennett,et al.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours , 2000, Current Biology.

[15]  Lynne Kiorpes,et al.  Factors limiting contrast sensitivity in experimentally amblyopic macaque monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  A. B. Sekuler,et al.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning , 1999, Nature.

[17]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  Lynne Kiorpes,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Amblyopia in the Visual Cortex of Macaque Monkeys with Experimental Strabismus and Anisometropia , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial uncertainty and sampling efficiency in amblyopic position acuity , 1998, Vision Research.

[24]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  S. Klein,et al.  Limitations on Position Coding Imposed by Undersampling and Univariance , 1996, Vision Research.

[26]  D. Field,et al.  Uncalibrated Distortions vs Undersampling , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  Bettina L. Beard,et al.  Spatial scale shifts in amblyopia , 1994, Vision Research.

[29]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[30]  R. Freeman,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: masking effects of noise. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  M E Woodruff,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .

[32]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia , 1987, Vision Research.

[34]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[35]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Hyperacuity and amblyopia , 1982, Nature.

[36]  R. Hess Developmental sensory impairment: amblyopia or tarachopia? , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[37]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[38]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[39]  D. M. Green,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF AUDITORY DETECTION JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Psychological review.

[40]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Barbara A Dosher,et al.  Perceptual learning retunes the perceptual template in foveal orientation identification. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[42]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[43]  William McIlhagga,et al.  Noisy templates explain area summation , 1999, Vision Research.

[44]  A. Parker,et al.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  Vision and visual dysfunction. , 1994, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[46]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .

[47]  D. Pelli The quantum efficiency of vision , 1990 .

[48]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.