Sustainable dam development in India between global norms and local practices

This paper explores reforms in environmental and resettlement policies in India and the influence of domestic and external actors on the reform process. It also analyses the ways in which environment and resettlement policies have been implemented in a number of hydropower projects. At project level the analysis focuses on how state and non-state actors influence decision-making on the introduction of superior environmental and social standards through changes in policies and laws. At macro level, the study begins by describing the multilevel processes that govern dam decision-making. It then considers the legal and policylevel changes in the areas of environmental clearance and resettlement and the role played by state and non-state actors in the changes that have been made in the last three decades. The dam projects selected are the Allain Duhangan Project, which is being funded by the International Finance Corporation, and the domestically funded Lower Subansiri and Dibang Multipurpose projects, the aim being to understand how superior social and environmental standards are put into practice and the role played by various state and non-state actors in this. The study argues that, at macro level, it is civil society which has been the major driver of change in the area of resettlement over the last three decades. In the environment arena the changes are the outcome of competing demands from civil society and growth-oriented ministries and departments of the Government of India. At project level, superior social and environmental standards are primarily driven by social mobilisation initiated by civil society. The presence of international actors like the International Finance Corporation, with superior social and environmental policies, catalyses the process.

[1]  Oliver Schlumberger,et al.  Autoritarismus in der arabischen Welt , 2008 .

[2]  Thilmann Altenburg,et al.  Industrial Policy in Ethiopia , 2010 .

[3]  Zankhana Shah,et al.  In the Midst of the Large Dam Controversy: Objectives, Criteria for Assessing Large Water Storages in the Developing World , 2008 .

[4]  Oliver Hensengerth Sustainable Dam development in China between global norms and local practices , 2010 .

[5]  Chinwe Ifejika Speranza,et al.  Resilient Adaptation to Climate Change in African Agriculture , 2010 .

[6]  John R Wood The Politics of Water Resource Development in India: The Narmada Dams Controversy , 2007 .

[7]  Peter Draper,et al.  The role of South African FDI in Southern Africa , 2010 .

[8]  Arundhati Roy,et al.  The greater common good , 1999 .

[9]  Conflict and Collective Action , 2020 .

[10]  Mikaela Gavas Consolidation or cooperation : The future of EU development cooperation , 2010 .

[11]  Christina Rosendahl,et al.  Industrial policy in Namibia , 2010 .

[12]  Klaus Liebig,et al.  Internationale Regulierung geistiger Eigentumsrechte und Wissenserwerb in Entwicklungsländern , 2007 .

[13]  Markus Loewe,et al.  Soziale Sicherung, informeller Sektor und das Potenzial von Kleinstversicherungen , 2009 .

[14]  Elke Herrfahrdt-Pähle,et al.  Introducing catchment management: the case of South Africa , 2010 .

[15]  Martin Stürmer,et al.  Let the good times roll? : Raising tax revenues from the extractive sector in sub-Saharan Africa during the commodity price boom , 2010 .

[16]  J. Hörandel,et al.  COSMIC RAYS FROM THE KNEE TO THE SECOND , 2007 .

[17]  K. Hochstetler Dams and Development: Transnational Struggles for Water and Power , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[18]  R. Guha India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy , 2007 .

[19]  Martin Bruckner,et al.  Counting CO2 emissions in a globalised world : Producer versus consumer-oriented methods for CO2 accounting , 2010 .

[20]  C. Streck Global Public Policy Networks as Coalitions for Change , 2002 .

[21]  Matthias Krause,et al.  The Political Economy of Water and Sanitation , 2009 .