Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging.

PURPOSE To determine if apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to differentiate brain tumors at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval or informed patient consent was not required. MR images were reviewed retrospectively in 275 patients with brain tumors: 147 males and 128 females 1-81 years old, treated between September 1997 and July 2003. Regions of interest were placed manually in tumor regions on MR images, and ADC was calculated with a five-point regression method at b values of 0, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 sec/mm2. ADC values were average values in tumor. All brain tumor subgroups were analyzed. Logistic discriminant analysis was performed by using ADC, age, and patient sex as independent variables to discriminate among tumor groups. RESULTS A significant negative correlation existed between ADC and astrocytic tumors of World Health Organization grades 2-4 (grade 2 vs grades 3 and 4, accuracy of 91.3% [P < .01]; grade 3 vs 4, accuracy of 82.4% [P < .01]). ADC of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNTs) was higher than that of astrocytic grade 2 tumors (accuracy, 100%) and other glioneuronal tumors. ADC of malignant lymphomas was lower than that of glioblastomas and metastatic tumors (accuracy, 83.6%; P < .01). ADC of primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) was lower than that of ependymomas (accuracy, 100%). ADC of meningiomas was lower than that of schwannomas (accuracy, 92.4%; P < .01). ADC of craniopharyngiomas was higher than that of pituitary adenomas (accuracy, 85.2%; P < .05). ADC of epidermoid tumors was lower than that of chordomas (accuracy, 100%). In meningiomas, ADC was not indicative of malignancy grade or histologic subtype. CONCLUSION ADC is useful for differentiation of some human brain tumors, particularly DNT, malignant lymphomas versus glioblastomas and metastatic tumors, and ependymomas versus PNETs.

[1]  T L Chenevert,et al.  Monitoring early response of experimental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  T. Akashi,et al.  Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  A. Albert,et al.  On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models , 1984 .

[4]  M Hoehn-Berlage,et al.  Quantitative diffusion MR imaging of cerebral tumor and edema. , 1994, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[5]  K. Kono,et al.  The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  K. Kurisu,et al.  Quantitative MR evaluation of intracranial epidermoid tumors by fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging and echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  M Hoehn-Berlage,et al.  High resolution quantitative relaxation and diffusion mri of three different experimental brain tumors in rat , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Usha Sinha,et al.  Relationships Between Choline Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Quantitative Histopathology in Human Glioma , 2000, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  C. Metreweli,et al.  Diffusion MR imaging in glioma: does it have any role in the pre-operation determination of grading of glioma? , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[10]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion‐weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  V. Jellús,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  C. Daumas-Duport Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumours , 1993, Brain pathology.

[13]  K. Hossmann,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of experimental brain tumors in rats , 1995, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[14]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. , 2002, Radiology.

[15]  M A Edgar,et al.  Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion-weighted images: correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  J K Smith,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  R C McKinstry,et al.  Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  Inverse correlation between choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient in human glioma , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  F Scaravilli,et al.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour Features in 16 patients , 1994 .

[20]  K. Krabbe,et al.  MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[21]  G. Cosnard,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements within intracranial epidermoid cysts in six patients , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[22]  C. Daumas-Duport,et al.  Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumors: Nonspecific Histological Forms – A Study of 40 Cases , 1999, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.