Target object moderation of attentional orienting by gazes or arrows

Recent studies have attempted to demonstrate the importance of the characteristics of directional cues and observers’ traits in attentional orienting. This study investigated how attentional orienting is influenced by target processing. Two experiments showed the critical role played by target processing in attentional orienting that relies on eye-gaze and arrow cues. In Experiment 1, stronger attentional orienting was observed under the object-target condition compared with the scrambled-display condition, irrespective of whether gaze or arrow cues were used. The results indicated that meaningful targets produced stronger attentional orienting than did meaningless targets, regardless of the social characteristics of the target. Experiment 2, which investigated whether attentional orienting was influenced by differences in the meaningfulness of targets regardless of their perceptual features, used participants’ own faces and the faces of others as target stimuli; one’s own face is typically more meaningful than the face of another. The results showed stronger attentional orienting in response to one’s own face than in response to another’s face under both gaze and arrow conditions. These findings suggest that the use of task-irrelevant meaningful information as targets may be effective in enhancing attention, regardless of perceptual features.

[1]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Human Social Attention , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  J. Tipples,et al.  Increased gaze following for fearful faces. It depends on what you’re looking for! , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Andrew P Bayliss,et al.  Gaze and arrow cueing of attention reveals individual differences along the autism spectrum as a function of target context. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[6]  Katsuki Nakamura,et al.  Functional training for initiating joint attention in children with autism. , 2008, Research in developmental disabilities.

[7]  M. Toichi,et al.  Attention orienting by eye gaze and arrows reveals flexibility to environmental changes. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Theodore Alexopoulos,et al.  I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli , 2012 .

[9]  M. Toichi,et al.  Is impaired joint attention present in non-clinical individuals with high autistic traits? , 2015, Molecular Autism.

[10]  M. Toichi,et al.  Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  P. Ekman.  Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[12]  T. Kochiyama,et al.  Commonalities and differences in the spatiotemporal neural dynamics associated with automatic attentional shifts induced by gaze and arrows , 2014, Neuroscience Research.

[13]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Regional Neural Response Differences in the Determination of Faces or Houses Positioned in a Wide Visual Field , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  S. Tipper,et al.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Wataru Sato,et al.  Dynamic fearful gaze does not enhance attention orienting in individuals with Asperger’s disorder , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Ruth H. Maki,et al.  The effects of self-reference versus other reference on the recall of traits and nouns , 1985 .

[21]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology How Does Encoding Context Affect Memory in Younger and Older Adults? , 2022 .

[22]  M. Toichi,et al.  Can gaze-cueing be helpful for detecting sound in autism spectrum disorder? , 2013 .

[23]  Toshikazu Hasegawa,et al.  Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[24]  Amelia R Hunt,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Physical Self-similarity Enhances the Gaze Cueing Effect , 2022 .

[25]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Investigating hemispheric lateralization of reflexive attention to gaze and arrow cues , 2012, Brain and Cognition.

[26]  Shihui Han,et al.  Short Article: Attentional Orientation Induced by Temporarily Established Self-Referential Cues , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  T. Kochiyama,et al.  Rapid Amygdala Gamma Oscillations in Response to Eye Gaze , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  S. Tipper,et al.  Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context , 2010, Visual cognition.

[29]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining. , 2010, Acta Psychologica.

[30]  Peter Sturmey,et al.  Increasing responding to others' joint attention directives using circumscribed interests. , 2013, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[31]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Inhibition of Return in Response to Eye Gaze and Peripheral Cues in Young People with Asperger’s Syndrome , 2012, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.