Deep learning at base-resolution reveals motif syntax of the cis-regulatory code
暂无分享,去创建一个
Charles E. McAnany | A. Kundaje | J. Zeitlinger | J. Gagneur | S. Krueger | Žiga Avsec | Avanti Shrikumar | Melanie Weilert | Amr Alexandari | Khyati Dalal | Robin Fropf | Amr M. Alexandari
[1] J. H. Ward. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .
[2] H R Drew,et al. Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer: conformation and dynamics. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[3] D. Stillman,et al. Specific interactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins with a promoter region of eukaryotic tRNA genes. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4] T. D. Schneider,et al. Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.
[5] A DNA-binding domain of human transcription factor IIIC2. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.
[6] Frederick P. Brooks,et al. Computing smooth molecular surfaces , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[7] T. Maniatis,et al. Virus induction of human IFNβ gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome , 1995, Cell.
[8] C C Adams,et al. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[9] O. Wrange,et al. Accessibility of a glucocorticoid response element in a nucleosome depends on its rotational positioning , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[10] K Schulten,et al. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.
[11] M. Levine,et al. Long-range repression in the Drosophila embryo. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[12] B. Müller-Hill,et al. Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[13] Benno Müller-Hill,et al. Repression oflacPromoter as a Function of Distance, Phase and Quality of an AuxiliarylacOperator , 1996 .
[14] T. Richmond,et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.
[15] D. Ambrosetti,et al. Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.
[16] G Vriend,et al. New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. , 1998, Genes & development.
[17] Matthias Wilmanns,et al. Synergism with the Coactivator OBF-1 (OCA-B, BOB-1) Is Mediated by a Specific POU Dimer Configuration , 2000, Cell.
[18] G. Church,et al. Computational identification of cis-regulatory elements associated with groups of functionally related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[19] Kathleen Marchal,et al. A higher-order background model improves the detection of promoter regulatory elements by Gibbs sampling , 2001, Bioinform..
[20] Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al. Fast optimal leaf ordering for hierarchical clustering , 2001, ISMB.
[21] M. Murakami,et al. The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.
[22] Shinya Yamanaka,et al. Fbx15 Is a Novel Target of Oct3/4 but Is Dispensable for Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Mouse Development , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[23] Matthias Wilmanns,et al. Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers. , 2003, Genes & development.
[24] D. Arnosti,et al. Information display by transcriptional enhancers , 2003, Development.
[25] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. STRIDE: a web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[26] G. Marius Clore,et al. Molecular Basis for Synergistic Transcriptional Activation by Oct1 and Sox2 Revealed from the Solution Structure of the 42-kDa Oct1·Sox2·Hoxb1-DNA Ternary Transcription Factor Complex* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[27] Michael Levine,et al. Coordinate enhancers share common organizational features in the Drosophila genome. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[28] Graziano Pesole,et al. Weeder Web: discovery of transcription factor binding sites in a set of sequences from co-regulated genes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[29] D. Haussler,et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. , 2005, Genome research.
[30] Xi Chen,et al. Reciprocal Transcriptional Regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 Complex in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[31] M. Kimura. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[32] Mark Ptashne,et al. Regulation of transcription: from lambda to eukaryotes. , 2005, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[33] X. Chen,et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.
[34] M. Levine,et al. Computational Models for Neurogenic Gene Expression in the Drosophila Embryo , 2006, Current Biology.
[35] Alexander E. Kel,et al. TRANSFAC® and its module TRANSCompel®: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[36] N. D. Clarke,et al. Integration of External Signaling Pathways with the Core Transcriptional Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.
[37] Clifford A. Meyer,et al. Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.
[38] S. Orkin,et al. Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] E. Liu,et al. Evolution of the mammalian transcription factor binding repertoire via transposable elements. , 2008, Genome research.
[40] P. Park,et al. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.
[41] Raluca Gordân,et al. Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions. , 2009, Genome research.
[42] Saurabh Sinha,et al. A Biophysical Model for Analysis of Transcription Factor Interaction and Binding Site Arrangement from Genome-Wide Binding Data , 2009, PloS one.
[43] Dmitri Papatsenko,et al. Organization of developmental enhancers in the Drosophila embryo , 2009, Nucleic acids research.
[44] A. Stathopoulos,et al. Design flexibility in cis-regulatory control of gene expression: synthetic and comparative evidence. , 2009, Developmental biology.
[45] Raymond K. Auerbach,et al. PeakSeq enables systematic scoring of ChIP-seq experiments relative to controls , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.
[46] Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..
[47] Richard Durbin,et al. Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .
[48] Mikael Bodén,et al. MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..
[49] Richard W. Lusk,et al. Evolutionary Mirages: Selection on Binding Site Composition Creates the Illusion of Conserved Grammars in Drosophila Enhancers , 2010, PLoS genetics.
[50] L. Mirny,et al. Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[51] Yuchun Guo,et al. Discovering homotypic binding events at high spatial resolution , 2010, Bioinform..
[52] Aaron R. Quinlan,et al. BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE , 2022 .
[53] G. Bourque,et al. Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells , 2010, Nature Genetics.
[54] Z. Weng,et al. Genomic Binding Profiles of Functionally Distinct RNA Polymerase III Transcription Complexes in Human Cells , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[55] Heidi Dvinge,et al. PeakAnalyzer: Genome-wide annotation of chromatin binding and modification loci , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[56] S. Barolo,et al. Structural rules and complex regulatory circuitry constrain expression of a Notch- and EGFR-regulated eye enhancer. , 2010, Developmental cell.
[57] Galt P. Barber,et al. BigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets , 2010, Bioinform..
[58] Chad A. Cowan,et al. Rewirable gene regulatory networks in the preimplantation embryonic development of three mammalian species. , 2010, Genome research.
[59] Marcel Martin. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .
[60] Peter J. Bickel,et al. Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments , 2011, 1110.4705.
[61] P. Donovan,et al. A Novel Role for an RNA Polymerase III Subunit POLR3G in Regulating Pluripotency in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2011, Stem cells.
[62] Michael A. Beer,et al. Discriminative prediction of mammalian enhancers from DNA sequence. , 2011, Genome research.
[63] Sündüz Keleş,et al. A Statistical Framework for the Analysis of ChIP-Seq Data , 2011, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[64] B. Pugh,et al. Comprehensive Genome-wide Protein-DNA Interactions Detected at Single-Nucleotide Resolution , 2011, Cell.
[65] Yuchun Guo,et al. High Resolution Genome Wide Binding Event Finding and Motif Discovery Reveals Transcription Factor Spatial Binding Constraints , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[66] J. Posakony,et al. Role of Architecture in the Function and Specificity of Two Notch-Regulated Transcriptional Enhancer Modules , 2012, PLoS genetics.
[67] Marc D. Perry,et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia , 2012, Genome research.
[68] E. Birney,et al. A Transcription Factor Collective Defines Cardiac Cell Fate and Reflects Lineage History , 2012, Cell.
[69] David Z. Chen,et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data , 2012, Nature.
[70] V. Praz,et al. Genomic Study of RNA Polymerase II and III SNAPc-Bound Promoters Reveals a Gene Transcribed by Both Enzymes and a Broad Use of Common Activators , 2012, PLoS genetics.
[71] Greg Donahue,et al. Facilitators and Impediments of the Pluripotency Reprogramming Factors' Initial Engagement with the Genome , 2012, Cell.
[72] ENCODEConsortium,et al. An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.
[73] David A. Orlando,et al. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation , 2012, Nature.
[74] T. Bailey,et al. Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq , 2012, Nucleic acids research.
[75] Z. Yakhini,et al. Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.
[76] William Stafford Noble,et al. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors , 2012, Genome research.
[77] K. Struhl,et al. Determinants of nucleosome positioning , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[78] T. Furey,et al. DNase-seq predicts regions of rotational nucleosome stability across diverse human cell types , 2013, Genome research.
[79] Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al. DNA-Binding Specificities of Human Transcription Factors , 2013, Cell.
[80] Ian Chambers,et al. A direct physical interaction between Nanog and Sox2 regulates embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2013, The EMBO journal.
[81] Charles Blatti,et al. Computational Identification of Diverse Mechanisms Underlying Transcription Factor-DNA Occupancy , 2013, PLoS genetics.
[82] Lijiang Yang,et al. Probing Allostery Through DNA , 2013, Science.
[83] Jerzy Tiuryn,et al. Comprehensive prediction in 78 human cell lines reveals rigidity and compactness of transcription factor dimers , 2013, Genome research.
[84] Victor B. Zhurkin,et al. Rotational positioning of nucleosomes facilitates selective binding of p53 to response elements associated with cell cycle arrest , 2013, Nucleic acids research.
[85] Felicia S. L. Ng,et al. Constrained transcription factor spacing is prevalent and important for transcriptional control of mouse blood cells , 2014, Nucleic Acids Research.
[86] Lars Hufnagel,et al. Subtle Changes in Motif Positioning Cause Tissue-Specific Effects on Robustness of an Enhancer's Activity , 2014, PLoS genetics.
[87] Matthew Slattery,et al. Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[88] Uwe Ohler,et al. Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection , 2014, Nucleic acids research.
[89] Felipe Merino,et al. Cooperative DNA Recognition Modulated by an Interplay between Protein-Protein Interactions and DNA-Mediated Allostery , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[90] P. Robson,et al. Selective influence of Sox2 on POU transcription factor binding in embryonic and neural stem cells , 2015, EMBO reports.
[91] M. Pellegrini,et al. Pioneer Transcription Factors Target Partial DNA Motifs on Nucleosomes to Initiate Reprogramming , 2015, Cell.
[92] Mitchell D. Miller,et al. Structure-based discovery of NANOG variant with enhanced properties to promote self-renewal and reprogramming of pluripotent stem cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[93] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[94] Wei Zhang,et al. Suboptimization of developmental enhancers , 2015, Science.
[95] Julia Zeitlinger,et al. ChIP-nexus: a novel ChIP-exo protocol for improved detection of in vivo transcription factor binding footprints , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.
[96] J. Zeitlinger,et al. Zelda overcomes the high intrinsic nucleosome barrier at enhancers during Drosophila zygotic genome activation , 2015, Genome research.
[97] A. Jolma,et al. DNA-dependent formation of transcription factor pairs alters their binding specificity , 2015, Nature.
[98] O. Troyanskaya,et al. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning–based sequence model , 2015, Nature Methods.
[99] B. Frey,et al. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.
[100] Céline Hernandez,et al. ChIP-exo signal associated with DNA-binding motifs provides insight into the genomic binding of the glucocorticoid receptor and cooperating transcription factors , 2015, Genome research.
[101] Michael Q. Zhang,et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes , 2015, Nature.
[102] J. Krijgsveld,et al. Expanding the Circuitry of Pluripotency by Selective Isolation of Chromatin-Associated Proteins , 2016, Molecular cell.
[103] B. Cohen,et al. Interactions between pluripotency factors specify cis-regulation in embryonic stem cells , 2016, Genome research.
[104] David R. Kelley,et al. Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks , 2015, bioRxiv.
[105] A. Pozner,et al. PAtCh-Cap: input strategy for improving analysis of ChIP-exo data sets and beyond , 2016, Nucleic acids research.
[106] Patricia P. Chan,et al. GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..
[107] Jianling Zhong,et al. Mapping nucleosome positions using DNase-seq , 2016, Genome research.
[108] Bin Xiong,et al. Insights into Nucleosome Organization in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells through Chemical Mapping , 2016, Cell.
[109] Jacqueline M. Dresch,et al. Quantitative perturbation-based analysis of gene expression predicts enhancer activity in early Drosophila embryo , 2016, eLife.
[110] Richard J Maraia,et al. RNA Polymerase III Advances: Structural and tRNA Functional Views. , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[111] S. Mango,et al. Pioneer transcription factors, chromatin dynamics, and cell fate control. , 2016, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[112] Heiga Zen,et al. WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio , 2016, SSW.
[113] Jun S. Song,et al. Categorical spectral analysis of periodicity in nucleosomal DNA , 2016, Nucleic acids research.
[114] Teemu Kivioja,et al. PeakXus: comprehensive transcription factor binding site discovery from ChIP-Nexus and ChIP-Exo experiments , 2016, Bioinform..
[115] Avanti Shrikumar,et al. Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences , 2017, ICML.
[116] M. Bulyk,et al. Identification of Human Lineage-Specific Transcriptional Coregulators Enabled by a Glossary of Binding Modules and Tunable Genomic Backgrounds. , 2017, Cell systems.
[117] J. Zeitlinger,et al. Drosophila poised enhancers are generated during tissue patterning with the help of repression , 2016, bioRxiv.
[118] A. Rowe,et al. Distinct Contributions of Tryptophan Residues within the Dimerization Domain to Nanog Function , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.
[119] Jennifer A. Mitchell,et al. Enhancers and super-enhancers have an equivalent regulatory role in embryonic stem cells through regulation of single or multiple genes , 2017, Genome research.
[120] Justin Crocker,et al. Using synthetic biology to study gene regulatory evolution. , 2017, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[121] Charles J. Vaske,et al. Predicting DNA accessibility in the pan-cancer tumor genome using RNA-seq, WGS, and deep learning , 2017 .
[122] Sharon E. Torigoe,et al. A dynamic interplay of enhancer elements regulates Klf4 expression in naïve pluripotency , 2017, Genes & development.
[123] Beilun Wang,et al. Deep Motif Dashboard: Visualizing and Understanding Genomic Sequences Using Deep Neural Networks , 2016, PSB.
[124] Daniel Quang,et al. FactorNet: a deep learning framework for predicting cell type specific transcription factor binding from nucleotide-resolution sequential data , 2017, bioRxiv.
[125] E. Morgunova,et al. Structural perspective of cooperative transcription factor binding. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.
[126] Ting Wang,et al. Functional cis-regulatory modules encoded by mouse-specific endogenous retrovirus , 2017, Nature Communications.
[127] Jonathan M. Cairns,et al. Long-Range Enhancer Interactions Are Prevalent in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and Are Reorganized upon Pluripotent State Transition , 2018, Cell reports.
[128] David R. Kelley,et al. Sequential regulatory activity prediction across chromosomes with convolutional neural networks. , 2018, Genome research.
[129] S. Tomlinson,et al. Esrrb extinction triggers dismantling of naïve pluripotency and marks commitment to differentiation , 2018, The EMBO journal.
[130] Jun Cheng,et al. Modeling positional effects of regulatory sequences with spline transformations increases prediction accuracy of deep neural networks , 2017, bioRxiv.
[131] Biswajyoti Sahu,et al. The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome , 2018, Nature.
[132] P. Robson,et al. Dynamic changes in Sox2 spatio-temporal expression promote the second cell fate decision through Fgf4/Fgfr2 signaling in preimplantation mouse embryos , 2016, bioRxiv.
[133] Shaun Mahony,et al. Characterizing protein-DNA binding event subtypes in ChIP-exo data , 2018, bioRxiv.
[134] Anshul Kundaje,et al. Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences , 2018, bioRxiv.
[135] Z. Paroush,et al. Capicua controls Toll/IL-1 signaling targets independently of RTK regulation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[136] B. Cohen,et al. Synthetic and genomic regulatory elements reveal aspects of cis regulatory grammar in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2018, bioRxiv.
[137] Srinivas Ramachandran,et al. Precise genome-wide mapping of single nucleosomes and linkers in vivo , 2018, Genome Biology.
[138] Anna Shcherbina,et al. TF-MoDISco v0.4.4.2-alpha: Technical Note , 2018, ArXiv.
[139] Jun Cheng,et al. The Kipoi repository accelerates community exchange and reuse of predictive models for genomics , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.
[140] Yoseph Barash,et al. Improving interpretability of deep learning models: splicing codes as a case study , 2019 .
[141] C. Todd,et al. Functional evaluation of transposable elements as enhancers in mouse embryonic and trophoblast stem cells , 2019, eLife.
[142] Georg Seelig,et al. A Deep Neural Network for Predicting and Engineering Alternative Polyadenylation , 2019, Cell.
[143] David G. Knowles,et al. Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning , 2019, Cell.
[144] Sangdun Choi,et al. Structural mechanism of DNA-mediated Nanog–Sox2 cooperative interaction , 2019, RSC advances.
[145] Steven Henikoff,et al. Pioneer Factor-Nucleosome Binding Events during Differentiation Are Motif Encoded. , 2019, Molecular cell.
[146] L. Yampolsky,et al. Pou5f3, SoxB1, and Nanog remodel chromatin on high nucleosome affinity regions at zygotic genome activation , 2018, bioRxiv.
[147] Howard Y. Chang,et al. Satb1 integrates DNA binding site geometry and torsional stress to differentially target nucleosome-dense regions , 2019, Nature Communications.