System identification of suspension bridge from ambient vibration response

The paper addresses and evaluates the application of system identification to a suspension bridge using ambient vibration response. To obtain dynamic characteristics of the bridge, two output-only time-domain system identification methods are employed namely, the Random Decrement Method combined with the Ibrahim Time Domain (ITD) method and the Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) combined with the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA). Accuracy and efficiency of both methods are investigated, and compared with the results from a Finite Element Model. The results of system identification demonstrate that using both methods, ambient vibration measurement can provide reliable information on dynamic characteristics of the bridge. The NExT-ERA technique, however, is more practical and efficient especially when applied to voluminous data from multi-channel measurement. The results from three days of measurements indicate the wind-velocity dependency of natural frequency and damping ratio particularly for low-order modes. The sources of these dependencies appear to be the effect of aerodynamic forces alongside the girder, and friction force from the bearing near the towers.

[1]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[2]  Colin Anthony Taylor,et al.  AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS OF THE HUMBER SUSPENSION BRIDGE AND COM PARISON WITH CALCULATED CHARACTERISTICS , 1987 .

[3]  Hirotugu Akaike,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of structural parameters from random vibration data , 1973 .

[4]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Structural identification of a nonproportionally damped system and its application to a full-scale suspension bridge , 2005 .

[5]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Dynamic Testing and System Identification of a Multi-Span Highway Bridge , 1999 .

[6]  Raimundo Delgado,et al.  Dynamic Tests on Large Cable-Stayed Bridge , 2001 .

[7]  David L. Brown,et al.  Parameter Estimation Techniques for Modal Analysis , 1979 .

[8]  Y. Tamura,et al.  Evaluation of amplitude-dependent damping and natural frequency of buildings during strong winds , 1996 .

[9]  C. Farrar,et al.  SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FROM AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS ON A BRIDGE , 1997 .

[10]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Experimental study of laser Doppler vibrometer and ambient vibration for vibration-based damage detection , 2006 .

[11]  George W. Housner,et al.  Ambient Vibration Tests of a Suspension Bridge , 1978 .

[12]  S. R. Ibrahim.  Random Decrement Technique for Modal Identification of Structures , 1977 .

[13]  Richard S. Pappa,et al.  Large Modal Survey Testing Using the Ibrahim Time Domain Identification Technique , 1982 .

[14]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  NATURAL EXCITATION TECHNIQUE AND EIGENSYSTEM REALIZATION ALGORITHM FOR PHASE I OF THE IASC-ASCE BENCHMARK PROBLEM: SIMULATED DATA , 2004 .

[15]  Nuno M. M. Maia,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis , 1997 .

[16]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[17]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[18]  A. B. Dunwoody,et al.  A Mathematical Basis for the Random Decrement Vibration Signature Analysis Technique , 1982 .

[19]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Ambient Vibration Studies of Golden Gate Bridge: I. Suspended Structure , 1985 .

[20]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[21]  Dar Yun Chiang,et al.  Modal parameter identification from ambient response , 1999 .

[22]  E. C. Mikulcik,et al.  A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response , 1977 .