Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'd You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback

It is expected that automated vehicles (AVs) will only be used when customers believe them to be safe, trustworthy, and match their personal driving style. As AVs are not very common today, most previous studies on trust, user experience, or acceptance measures in automated driving are based on qualitative measures. The approach followed in this work is different, as we compared the direct effect of human drivers versus automated driving systems (ADSs) on the front seat passenger. In a driving simulator study (N=48), subjects had either to ride with an ADS, a male, or a female driver. Driving scenarios were the same for all subjects. Findings from quantitative measurements (HRV, face tracking) and qualitative pre-/post study surveys and interviews suggest that there are no significant differences between the passenger groups. Our conclusion is, that passengers are already inclined to accept ADS and that the market is ready for AVs.

[1]  M. Tscheligi,et al.  Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  John D. Watt,et al.  Effect of Boredom Proneness on Time Perception , 1991, Psychological reports.

[3]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[4]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[5]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[6]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014 .

[7]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Understanding Robot Acceptance , 2011 .

[9]  Fredrick Ekman,et al.  Creating Appropriate Trust for Autonomous Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Design , 2016 .

[10]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience , 2014, AutomotiveUI.

[11]  William Payre,et al.  Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .

[12]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Measuring Trust of Autonomous Vehicles: A Development and Validation Study , 2015, HCI.

[14]  E. Salas,et al.  Human Factors : The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society , 2012 .

[15]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  The challenges of partially automated driving , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Maria Riveiro,et al.  Perceived intelligence as a factor in (semi-) autonomous vehicle UX , 2015 .

[17]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Affect grid : A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal , 1989 .

[18]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[19]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving , 2016, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[20]  Todd Litman,et al.  Changing North American vehicle-travel price sensitivities: Implications for transport and energy policy , 2013 .

[21]  E. D. de Geus,et al.  Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements , 2015, PloS one.

[22]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  Rossana Castaldo,et al.  Acute mental stress assessment via short term HRV analysis in healthy adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis , 2015, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[24]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[25]  Göran Falkman,et al.  Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving , 2013, AutomotiveUI.