Measures of spatiotemporal organization differentiate persistent from long-standing atrial fibrillation.

AIMS This study presents an automatic diagnostic method for the discrimination between persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation (AF) based on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS AND RESULTS Standard 12-lead ECG recordings were acquired in 53 patients with either persistent (N= 20) or long-standing AF (N= 33), the latter including both long-standing persistent and permanent AF. A combined frequency analysis of multiple ECG leads followed by the computation of standard complexity measures provided a method for the quantification of spatiotemporal AF organization. All possible pairs of precordial ECG leads were analysed by this method and resulting organization measures were used for automatic classification of persistent and long-standing AF signals. Correct classification rates of 84.9% were obtained, with a predictive value for long-standing AF of 93.1%. Spatiotemporal organization as measured in lateral precordial leads V5 and V6 was shown to be significantly lower during long-standing AF than persistent AF, suggesting that time-related alterations in left atrial electrical activity can be detected in the ECG. CONCLUSION Accurate discrimination between persistent and long-standing AF based on standard surface recordings was demonstrated. This information could contribute to optimize the management of sustained AF, permitting appropriate therapeutic decisions and thereby providing substantial clinical cost savings.

[1]  Raúl Alcaraz,et al.  The application of nonlinear metrics to assess organization differences in short recordings of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[3]  S. Landas,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Fibrosis Governs Fibrillation Wave Dynamics in the Posterior Left Atrium During Heart Failure , 2007, Circulation research.

[4]  Jean-Marc Vesin,et al.  Cancellation of Ventricular Activity in the ECG: Evaluation of Novel and Existing Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  L. Sörnmo,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of the atrial cycle length during atrial fibrillation in man: introducing, validating and illustrating a new ECG method. , 1998, Cardiovascular research.

[6]  E. Kholmovski,et al.  Association of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  D. Haines,et al.  Assessment of Global Atrial Fibrillation Organization to Optimize Timing of Atrial Defibrillation , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  M. Allessie,et al.  Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. , 1995, Circulation.

[9]  E. Morii,et al.  Advanced left-atrial fibrosis is associated with unsuccessful maze operation for valvular atrial fibrillation. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  Robby Nieuwlaat,et al.  Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Bollmann,et al.  Frequency analysis of human atrial fibrillation using the surface electrocardiogram and its response to ibutilide. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  David S. Stoffer,et al.  The spectral envelope and its applications , 2000 .

[14]  Theofanis Sapatinas,et al.  Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2005 .

[15]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the spatial organization of atrial fibrillation in the intact human heart. , 1996, Circulation.

[16]  Michel Haïssaguerre,et al.  Left Atrial Appendage Activity Translation in the Standard 12‐Lead ECG , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  G. Moe,et al.  On the multiple wavelet hypothesis o f atrial fibrillation. , 1962 .

[18]  Prashanthan Sanders,et al.  Frequency Mapping of the Pulmonary Veins in Paroxysmal Versus Permanent Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[19]  Matthew W Kay,et al.  Spatial and temporal stability of the dominant frequency of activation in human atrial fibrillation. , 2006, Journal of electrocardiology.

[20]  S Nattel,et al.  Ionic targets for drug therapy and atrial fibrillation-induced electrical remodeling: insights from a mathematical model. , 1999, Cardiovascular research.

[21]  I. Rezek,et al.  Stochastic complexity measures for physiological signal analysis , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.