Processing of emotional information in children with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder

A possible etiological factor for the social disability described in children with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a deficit in the ability to accurately evaluate emotional stimuli. Children with ADHD were compared to normal controls on a battery of emotional processing. This battery, the Minnesota Tests of Affective Processing (MNTAP), measures face perception and recognition of affective stimuli as conveyed via facial expression, language, and speech prosody. Overall, children with ADHD were found to be no different from normal children in their ability to process emotional cues. A subgroup of younger children with ADHD were found to have modest difficulties on a test of decoding facial affective stimuli. Significant differences were found between ADHD and normal control groups on those tasks requiring complex auditory processing and extensive use of working memory. Additional analyses found significant effects on affective processing for children with nonverbal impairment We conclude...

[1]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Diagnosing Learning Disorders: A Neuropsychological Framework , 1991 .

[2]  D. Granger,et al.  Social judgment processes in hyperactive boys: Effects of methylphenidate and comparisons with normal peers , 1990, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[3]  G. Hynd,et al.  Right hemispheric dysfunction in nonverbal learning disabilities: social, academic, and adaptive functioning in adults and children. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  J. A. Hanson,et al.  Facial affect recognition in children , 1988, Neurology.

[5]  M. Drake.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) , 1988 .

[6]  B. Rourke.  Syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: The final common pathway of white-matter disease/dysfunction? , 1987 .

[7]  L. Siegel,et al.  Peer interactions of normal and attention-deficit-disordered boys during free-play, cooperative task, and simulated classroom situations , 1987, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[8]  C. R. Glass,et al.  Hyperactive children and peer interaction: Knowledge and performance of social skills , 1987, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[9]  E. Silberman,et al.  Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  E. Walker,et al.  Facial discrimination and emotional recognition in schizophrenia and affective disorders. , 1986, Archives of general psychiatry.

[11]  R. Barkley,et al.  Psychological adjustment in learning disabled, hyperactive, and hyperactive/learning disabled children as measured by the personality inventory for children , 1984 .

[12]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social information processing in child psychiatric populations , 1984, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[13]  R. Barkley.  Hyperactive Children: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment , 1981 .

[14]  K. Heilman,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance for attention , 1980, Neurology.

[15]  B. Collins,et al.  Peer interaction in a structured communication task: comparisons of normal and hyperactive boys and of methylphenidate (Ritalin) and placebo effects. , 1979, Child development.

[16]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Normative data on Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales , 1978, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  G. McCloskey.  Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised , 1987 .

[19]  D. Tucker.  Lateral brain function, emotion, and conceptualization. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  E. Ozols.  Dimensions of social sensitivity in two types of learning-disabled children. , 1980 .

[21]  F. Boller,et al.  Simple reaction time: evidence for focal impairment from lesions of the right hemisphere. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Helmer R. Myklebust,et al.  Learning Disabilities: Educational Principles and Practices , 1967 .