Dentine and cementum as sources of nuclear DNA for use in human identification

Teeth are increasingly utilized as a source of nuclear DNA to aid identification of human remains. DNA extraction and the results of genetic analysis from these tissues are extremely variable and to some extent unpredictable. This study examines the availability of nuclear DNA in different areas of the dental hard tissues and explores the extent and nature of the variation within and between individuals. Results of this study indicate that nuclear DNA is available in widely variable quantities in dentine and cementum. This variation exists within teeth and between teeth, even between comparable teeth from the same individual. The quantity of DNA available in dentine is affected by age and dental disease, whereas that in cementum is not. Forensically useful genetic profiles were obtained from as little as 20 mg of tooth powder, thus avoiding the necessity for complete destruction of the tooth. A better understanding of why there is more DNA in one tooth tissue or region compared with another, and of the effects of disease and age, will aid in the selection of which tooth and tissue to sample and will increase the validity of the use of teeth as a source of nuclear DNA for human identification.

[1]  L. Rubio,et al.  Study of Short‐ and Long‐Term Storage of Teeth and Its Influence on DNA , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  D. Vieira,et al.  Genetic identification in endodontic treated tooth root , 2008 .

[3]  E. Cvetko,et al.  Cementum thickness in multirooted human molars: a histometric study by light microscopy. , 2008, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[4]  P. Danielson,et al.  Validation of Reduced‐Scale Reactions for the Quantifiler™ Human DNA Kit , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  T. Parsons,et al.  Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. , 2007, Croatian medical journal.

[6]  B. Kemp,et al.  Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[7]  Antonio Nanci,et al.  Ten Cate's Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function , 2003 .

[8]  D. Sweet,et al.  Quantification of forensic DNA from various regions of human teeth. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  S Andelinović,et al.  DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and teeth samples. , 2001, Croatian medical journal.

[10]  J. Antunes,et al.  Postmortem tooth loss in human identification processes. , 2000, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.

[11]  D. De Leo,et al.  Effects of individual dental factors on genomic DNA analysis. , 2000, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[12]  D. Primorac IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN REMAINS FROM MASS GRAVES FOUND IN CROATIA AND BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA , 2000 .

[13]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  Influence of soil storage and exposure period on DNA recovery from teeth , 1999, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[14]  D. Sweet,et al.  Recovery of DNA from human teeth by cryogenic grinding. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  B. Yakan,et al.  Coronal displacement of cementum: correlation between age and coronal movement of cementum in impacted teeth. , 1997, Australian dental journal.

[16]  M. Holland,et al.  A systematic approach to the sampling of dental DNA. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[17]  M. Skinner,et al.  Rates of putrefaction of dental pulp in the Northwest coast environment. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  L. Kobilinsky,et al.  Characterization of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) obtained from teeth subjected to various environmental conditions. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  Stephen Cohen,et al.  Pathways of the Pulp , 1976 .