A different view of queues in Ontario.

Prologue: Every health care system, regardless of how rich the country in which it operates, rations medical services, because no nation has the resources to match the insatiable demand for services. In the variety of approaches to rationing that nations employ, as David Naylor points out in this paper, the United Kingdom and the United States represent the extremes, Britain's National Health Service (NHS), which offers patients medical care that is free at the point of service, practices queue-based rationing. People face time delays before medical problems are addressed. In the United States, those with health insurance rarely have to wait long for treatment. But those without insurance have no ready access to care and must fend for themselves in public hospitals and other institutions prepared to accept charity cases. Canada prides itself on developing a health care system that strikes a middle ground. It is publicly funded and universally available, but care is privately provided. Administration and d...

[1]  W B Schwartz,et al.  Rationing health care: the choice before us. , 1990, Science.

[2]  C. Naylor,et al.  Containing Ontario's hospital costs under universal insurance in the 1980s: what was the record? , 1990, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Perceptions of the waiting period before coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1985, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[4]  D. Hay Socioeconomic status and health status: a study of males in the Canada Health Survey. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[5]  J. Horne,et al.  Utilization of Publicly Insured Health Services in Saskatchewan Before, During and After Copayment , 1980, Medical care.

[6]  E B Keeler,et al.  Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  F. Turcotte Controlling Health Care Costs by Direct Charges to Patients: Snare or Delusion? , 1982 .

[8]  W. Manning,et al.  Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  L L Roos,et al.  Managing Scarce Services: A Waiting List Approach to Cardiac Catheterization , 1990, Medical care.

[10]  R. Brook,et al.  DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CORONARY DISEASE: COMPARISON OF DOCTORS' ATTITUDES IN THE USA AND THE UK , 1988, The Lancet.

[11]  G. Schieber,et al.  International health spending: issues and trends. , 1991, Health affairs.

[12]  Kathleen LePoer Fowles,et al.  The AMA looks north with fear and loathing. , 1990, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[13]  W. Schwartz,et al.  Rationing hospital care. Lessons from Britain. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A Basinski,et al.  Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures , 1990, The Lancet.

[15]  Patrick Sullivan Criticism not meant to slight Canadian MDs, AMA president tells CMA conference. , 1990 .

[16]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Hospital care for elderly patients with diseases of the circulatory system. A comparison of hospital use in the United States and Canada. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Mulgan,et al.  The coronary bypass waiting list: a social evaluation. , 1990, The New Zealand medical journal.

[18]  J Lomas,et al.  Monitoring the diffusion of a technology: coronary artery bypass surgery in Ontario. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  Effects of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  A. Relman The trouble with rationing. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  G. Stoddart,et al.  Controlling health expenditures--the Canadian reality. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  C. Naylor,et al.  Placing patients in the queue for coronary revascularization: evidence for practice variations from an expert panel process. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[23]  W. Manning,et al.  The impact of cost sharing on emergency department use. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.