Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples

Clinical decision support is a powerful tool for improving healthcare quality and patient safety. However, developing a comprehensive package of decision support interventions is costly and difficult. If used well, Web 2.0 methods may make it easier and less costly to develop decision support. Web 2.0 is characterized by online communities, open sharing, interactivity and collaboration. Although most previous attempts at sharing clinical decision support content have worked outside of the Web 2.0 framework, several initiatives are beginning to use Web 2.0 to share and collaborate on decision support content. We present case studies of three efforts: the Clinfowiki, a world-accessible wiki for developing decision support content; Partners Healthcare eRooms, web-based tools for developing decision support within a single organization; and Epic Systems Corporation's Community Library, a repository for sharing decision support content for customers of a single clinical system vendor. We evaluate the potential of Web 2.0 technologies to enable collaborative development and sharing of clinical decision support systems through the lens of three case studies; analyzing technical, legal and organizational issues for developers, consumers and organizers of clinical decision support content in Web 2.0. We believe the case for Web 2.0 as a tool for collaborating on clinical decision support content appears strong, particularly for collaborative content development within an organization.

[1]  Silvana Quaglini,et al.  A Guideline Management System , 2004, MedInfo.

[2]  Robert A. Jenders,et al.  Towards improved knowledge sharing: assessment of the HL7 Reference Information Model to support medical logic module queries , 1997, AMIA.

[3]  Robert P Dellavalle,et al.  Wikis: the application of Web 2.0. , 2007, Archives of dermatology.

[4]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Tonya Hongsermeier,et al.  Managing the investment in clinical decision support , 2007 .

[6]  Yuval Shahar,et al.  A framework for a distributed, hybrid, multiple-ontology clinical-guideline library, and automated guideline-support tools , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  Marie-Christine Jaulent,et al.  Structuring Clinical Guidelines through the Recognition of Deontic Operators , 2005, MIE.

[8]  P. Barnes,et al.  Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. , 2004, Advance data.

[9]  Stephen B. Johnson,et al.  Medical decision support: experience with implementing the Arden Syntax at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[10]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[13]  D. Classen,et al.  Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  Mads Haahr,et al.  Personalised, Collaborative Spam Filtering , 2004, CEAS.

[15]  David W. Bates,et al.  Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. , 2001, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[16]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[17]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Model Formulation: GEM: A Proposal for a More Comprehensive Guideline Document Model Using XML , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  John Fox,et al.  Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[19]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  Samson W. Tu,et al.  Modeling Data and Knowledge in the EON Guideline Architecture , 2001, MedInfo.

[21]  David W. Bates,et al.  Case Report: The Use of Computers for Clinical Care: A Case Series of Advanced U.S. Sites , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  Review Paper: Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  Randolph A. Miller,et al.  Editorial Comments: Pragmatics of Implementing Guidelines on the Front Lines , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Decker Da Physician order entry. , 1994 .

[25]  R. McLean,et al.  The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? , 2007, The Medical journal of Australia.

[26]  Randolph A. Miller,et al.  Service-oriented Architecture in Medical Software: Promises and Perils , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians , 2001 .

[28]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Research Paper: Representing Clinical Guidelines in GLIF: Individual and Collaborative Expertise , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[29]  S. Skonetzki,et al.  Evolution of the HELEN Representation for Managing Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2005 .

[30]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Use of the WWW for distributed knowledge engineering for an EMR: the KnowledgeBank concept , 1998, AMIA.

[31]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Research Paper: The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[32]  M. Beers,et al.  Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: results of a US consensus panel of experts. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  Casimir A. Kulikowski,et al.  HGML: a hypertext guideline markup language , 2000, AMIA.

[34]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[35]  G O Barnett,et al.  Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system. , 1978, Medical care.

[36]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Extending the GEM model to support knowledge extraction from textual guidelines , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations , 1993, The Lancet.

[38]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format , 2000, AMIA.

[40]  C. McDonald Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  Dagmara Scalise Physician order entry. IMKI to success. Institute for Medical Knowledge Implementation. , 2002, Hospitals & health networks.

[42]  Dean Giustini,et al.  How Web 2.0 is changing medicine , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead , 2006 .

[44]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. , 1999, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[45]  Samson W. Tu,et al.  Executing Clinical Practice Guidelines using the SAGE Execution Engine , 2004, MedInfo.

[46]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[47]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Grand challenges in clinical decision support , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[48]  Adam Wright,et al.  White paper: A Roadmap for National Action on Clinical Decision Support , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[49]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[50]  Dagmara Scalise Pharmacy. A bar to bar codes. , 2002, Hospitals & health networks.

[51]  Aziz A. Boxwala,et al.  Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: : A literature review of guideline representation models , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[52]  E. Hing,et al.  Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001-03. , 2005, Advance data.