Optimal array of sand fences

Sand fences are widely applied to prevent soil erosion by wind in areas affected by desertification. Sand fences also provide a way to reduce the emission rate of dust particles, which is triggered mainly by the impacts of wind-blown sand grains onto the soil and affects the Earth’s climate. Many different types of fence have been designed and their effects on the sediment transport dynamics studied since many years. However, the search for the optimal array of fences has remained largely an empirical task. In order to achieve maximal soil protection using the minimal amount of fence material, a quantitative understanding of the flow profile over the relief encompassing the area to be protected including all employed fences is required. Here we use Computational Fluid Dynamics to calculate the average turbulent airflow through an array of fences as a function of the porosity, spacing and height of the fences. Specifically, we investigate the factors controlling the fraction of soil area over which the basal average wind shear velocity drops below the threshold for sand transport when the fences are applied. We introduce a cost function, given by the amount of material necessary to construct the fences. We find that, for typical sand-moving wind velocities, the optimal fence height (which minimizes this cost function) is around 50 cm, while using fences of height around 1.25 m leads to maximal cost.

[1]  Bailiang Li,et al.  Aerodynamics and morphodynamics of sand fences: A review , 2015 .

[2]  Hans Jürgen Herrmann,et al.  Numerical simulation of particle flow in a sand trap , 2008, 0808.2649.

[3]  Franc Kosel,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of the flow through a geometrically accurate porous wind barrier model , 2014 .

[4]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  A continuous model for sand dunes: Review, new developments and application to barchan dunes and barchan dune fields , 2010 .

[5]  José S Andrade,et al.  Giant saltation on Mars , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  José S. Andrade,et al.  Wind velocity and sand transport on a barchan dune , 2003 .

[7]  S. Lee,et al.  Trajectories of saltating sand particles behind a porous fence , 2015 .

[8]  Cheol Woo Park,et al.  Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements , 2002 .

[9]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak , 1985 .

[10]  H. Heywood The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes , 1941, Nature.

[11]  Ruey-Jen Yang,et al.  An investigation into the sheltering performance of porous windbreaks under various wind directions , 2010 .

[12]  Yaping Shao,et al.  Effect of Saltation Bombardment on the Entrainment of Dust by Wind , 1993 .

[13]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Oblique, stratified winds about a shelter fence. Part II: Comparison of measurements with numerical models , 2004 .

[14]  Rob Sarre,et al.  Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes , 1992 .

[15]  P. Hesp,et al.  Coastline orientation, aeolian sediment transport and foredune and dunefield dynamics of MoçAmbique Beach, Southern Brazil. , 2010 .

[16]  T. Pöschel,et al.  Two-dimensional airflow modeling underpredicts the wind velocity over dunes , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  José S. Andrade,et al.  Numerical modeling of the wind flow over a transverse dune , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Hans Jürgen Herrmann,et al.  Model for a dune field with an exposed water table , 2011, 1109.0278.

[19]  H J Herrmann,et al.  Continuum saltation model for sand dunes. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  In-Bok Lee,et al.  Principles of sand dune fixation with straw checkerboard technology and its effects on the environment , 2004 .

[21]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[22]  K. Nordstrom,et al.  Effects of beach raking and sand fences on dune dimensions and morphology , 2012 .

[23]  Se-Woon Hong,et al.  Numerical simulation of an array of fences in Saemangeum reclaimed land , 2009 .

[24]  Zhibao Dong,et al.  Threshold velocity for wind erosion: the effects of porous fences , 2006 .

[25]  C. Houser,et al.  Characterization of aeolian streamers using time-average videography , 2013 .

[26]  Hans Jürgen Herrmann,et al.  Model for the genesis of coastal dune fields with vegetation , 2011 .

[27]  José S Andrade,et al.  Aeolian transport layer. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[28]  J. Ellis,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of aeolian sand transport: Implications for field measurements , 2012 .

[29]  Hans Jürgen Herrmann,et al.  Modeling Transverse dunes with vegetation , 2009 .

[30]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Wind tunnel observation on the effect of a porous wind fence on shelter of saltating sand particles , 2010 .

[31]  H. Herrmann,et al.  Minimal model for aeolian sand dunes. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Rudolph P Savage EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF DUNE BUILDING WITH SAND FENCES , 2011 .

[33]  R. Baltaxe,et al.  Air flow patterns in the lee of model windbreaks , 1967 .

[34]  A. Tuzet,et al.  Observations and Modeling of Heavy Particle Deposition in a Windbreak Flow , 2006 .

[35]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[36]  Makoto Yamamoto,et al.  Visualization and laser measurements on the flow field and sand movement on sand dunes with porous fences , 2012 .

[37]  John D. Wilson,et al.  On the choice of a windbreak porosity profile , 1987 .

[38]  Jianjun Qu,et al.  Numerical evaluation of the scale problem on the wind flow of a windbreak , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[39]  N. Mahowald,et al.  Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2012 .

[40]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Morphodynamic modeling of aeolian dunes: Review and future plans , 2014 .

[41]  H. J. Herrmann,et al.  Calculation of the separation streamlines of barchans and transverse dunes , 2004 .

[42]  Hans J Herrmann,et al.  Vegetation against dune mobility. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[43]  Salem Alhajraf,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic modeling of drifting particles at porous fences , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[44]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  Psoriasis - a review of recent progress, characteristics, diagnostic management , 2022, Journal of Education, Health and Sport.

[45]  Ian Livingstone,et al.  Geomorphology of desert sand dunes: A review of recent progress , 2007 .

[46]  H. P. M. Melo,et al.  Linear stability analysis of transverse dunes , 2012, 1202.2842.

[47]  Shintaro Hotta,et al.  Finite element analysis of air flow around permeable sand fences , 1997 .

[48]  Wim Cornelis,et al.  Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control , 2005 .

[49]  Xiaoxu Wu,et al.  The effect of wind barriers on airflow in a wind tunnel , 2013 .

[50]  Angel Sanz-Andrés,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks , 2007 .

[51]  C. Jin,et al.  Variation in wind speed and surface shear stress from open floor to porous parallel windbreaks: A wind tunnel study , 2009 .

[52]  Sang Joon Lee,et al.  Laboratory measurements of velocity and turbulence field behind porous fences , 1999 .