Valuing Health Surveillance as an Information System: Interdisciplinary Insights

The economic evaluation of health surveillance systems and of health information is a methodological challenge, as for information systems in general. Main present threads are considering cost-effectiveness solutions, minimizing costs for a given technically required output, or cost-benefit analysis, balancing costs with economic benefits of duly informed public interventions. The latter option, following a linear command-and-control perspective, implies considering a main causal link between information, decision, action, and health benefits. Yet, valuing information, taking into account its nature and multiple sources, the modalities of its processing cycle, from production to diffusion, decentralized use and gradual building of a shared information capital, constitutes a promising challenge. This work proposes an interdisciplinary insight on the value of health surveillance to get a renewed theoretical framework integrating information and informatics theory and information economics. The reflection is based on a typological approach of value, basically distinguishing between use and non-use values. Through this structured discussion, the main idea is to expand the boundaries of surveillance evaluation, to focus on changes and trends, on the dynamic and networked structure of information systems, on the contribution of diverse data, and on the added value of combining qualitative and quantitative information. Distancing itself from the command-and-control model, this reflection considers the behavioral fundaments of many health risks, as well as the decentralized, progressive and deliberative dimension of decision-making in risk management. The framework also draws on lessons learnt from recent applications within and outside of health sector, as in surveillance of antimicrobial resistance, inter-laboratory networks, the use of big data or web sources, the diffusion of technological products and large-scale financial risks. Finally, the paper poses the bases to think the challenge of a workable approach to economic evaluation of health surveillance through a better understanding of health information value. It aims to avoid over-simplifying the range of health information benefits across society while keeping evaluation within the boundaries of what may be ascribed to the assessed information system.

[1]  Mikael Hildén,et al.  Integrated risk assessment and risk governance as socio-political phenomena: a synthetic view of the challenges. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Data, information and analytics as services , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  G. Salem,et al.  The Perceived Value of Passive Animal Health Surveillance: The Case of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Vietnam , 2015, Zoonoses and public health.

[4]  Amber M. Reinhart,et al.  Health information seeking: a review of measures and methods. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  P. Bonnet,et al.  The Value Chain Approach in One Health: Conceptual Framing and Focus on Present Applications and Challenges , 2017, Front. Vet. Sci..

[6]  Edgar H. Sibley,et al.  Information - organization - decision: Some strange loops , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[7]  M. Manierre,et al.  Gaps in knowledge: tracking and explaining gender differences in health information seeking. , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[8]  L. May,et al.  Beyond traditional surveillance: applying syndromic surveillance to developing settings – opportunities and challenges , 2009, BMC public health.

[9]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  HealthMap: Global Infectious Disease Monitoring through Automated Classification and Visualization of Internet Media Reports , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

[10]  R. Brownson,et al.  Understanding evidence-based public health policy. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[11]  A. Mankertz,et al.  Spotlight on measles 2010: Measles outbreak among travellers returning from a mass gathering, Germany, September to October 2010. , 2010, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[12]  R. Charrel,et al.  EPIMIC: A Simple Homemade Computer Program for Real-Time EPIdemiological Surveillance and Alert Based on MICrobiological Data , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  J. Schrenzel,et al.  Control of Infectious Diseases in the Era of European Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Consolidation: New Challenges and Opportunities for the Patient and for Public Health Surveillance , 2018, Front. Med..

[14]  C. Saegerman,et al.  The Added-Value of Using Participatory Approaches to Assess the Acceptability of Surveillance Systems: The Case of Bovine Tuberculosis in Belgium , 2016, PloS one.

[15]  J. Klein,et al.  Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[16]  H. Varian,et al.  A STRATEGIC GUIDE TO THE NETWORK ECONOMY , 2002 .

[17]  Catherine Fallon,et al.  Entre gestion de crise et vigilance : quand les médias et l'administration publique sont appelés à construire un référentiel partagé , 2009 .

[18]  Xavier Dolques,et al.  Une expérience de constitution d’un système d’information multi-sources pour l’étude de la qualité de l’eau , 2014 .

[19]  A. Lindberg,et al.  Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[20]  Jonathan Levin,et al.  Economics in the age of big data , 2014, Science.

[21]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Big data's role in expanding access to financial services in China , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[22]  K. Stärk,et al.  Conceptualising the technical relationship of animal disease surveillance to intervention and mitigation as a basis for economic analysis , 2011, BMC health services research.

[23]  Muhammad Razuan Abdul Razak,et al.  PART III: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2015 .

[24]  J. Rushton,et al.  Economic Assessment of Zoonoses Surveillance in a ‘One Health’ Context: A Conceptual Framework , 2016, Zoonoses and public health.

[25]  Olivier Godard,et al.  Social decision making in the context of scientific controversies , 1992 .

[26]  Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux,et al.  Application of discrete choice experiment to assess farmers' willingness to report swine diseases in the Red River Delta region, Vietnam. , 2017, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[27]  Mikael Hildén,et al.  The significance of information frameworks in integrated risk assessment and management , 2008 .

[28]  K. Stärk,et al.  Economic principles for resource allocation decisions at national level to mitigate the effects of disease in farm animal populations , 2012, Epidemiology and Infection.

[29]  R. Horan,et al.  Jointly Determined Livestock Disease Dynamics and Decentralised Economic Behaviour , 2011 .

[30]  Peter Ndeboc Fonkwo Pricing infectious disease , 2008, EMBO reports.

[31]  Veerle Fievez,et al.  The economic value of information provided by milk biomarkers under different scenarios: Case-study of an ex-ante analysis of fat-to-protein ratio and fatty acid profile to detect subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows , 2018 .

[32]  Alice Min,et al.  Syndromic Surveillance for Influenza in the Emergency Department–A Systematic Review , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  John Stelling,et al.  The world's microbiology laboratories can be a global microbial sensor network. , 2014, Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud.

[34]  S. Baum Value Typology in Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2012 .

[35]  A. Fadlaoui,et al.  Economic evaluation for conservation of farm animal genetic resources. , 2005, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[36]  K. Khan,et al.  Spread of a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus via global airline transportation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Evaluation of Epidemic Intelligence Systems Integrated in the Early Alerting and Reporting Project for the Detection of A/H5N1 Influenza Events , 2013, PloS one.

[38]  R. Snow,et al.  Review of the Evidence. , 1964, Science.

[39]  Pascal Bonnet,et al.  The LIMS Community and its collaborative Livestock Information Management System for managing livestock statistics and sharing information in the SADC region (Southern African Development Community). , 2010 .

[40]  T. O'Brien,et al.  Integrated Multilevel Surveillance of the World's Infecting Microbes and Their Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents , 2011, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[41]  Dinh Bao Truong,et al.  When private actors matter: Information-sharing network and surveillance of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Vietnam. , 2015, Acta tropica.

[42]  Eric D. Ebel,et al.  Estimating the Type II Error of Detecting Changes in Foodborne Illnesses via Public Health Surveillance , 2017 .

[43]  Fumie Yokota,et al.  Value of Information Literature Analysis: A Review of Applications in Health Risk Management , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[44]  Bernardo Gozzini,et al.  Semi-Automatic Operational Service for Drought Monitoring and Forecasting in the Tuscany Region , 2018 .

[45]  L.J. Hoinville,et al.  Proposed terms and concepts for describing and evaluating animal-health surveillance systems. , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[46]  Barbara Häsler,et al.  The value of information: Current challenges in surveillance implementation. , 2015, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[47]  Jari Lyytimäki,et al.  Unrecognized, concealed, or forgotten – the case of absent information in risk communication , 2011 .

[48]  J. David Johnson,et al.  Health-related information seeking: Is it worth it? , 2014, Inf. Process. Manag..

[49]  Donald J. Sharp,et al.  An Economic Evaluation of PulseNet: A Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[50]  Son Doan,et al.  BioCaster: detecting public health rumors with a Web-based text mining system , 2008, Bioinform..

[51]  Reza Yousefi Nooraie,et al.  A Network Analysis Perspective to Implementation: The Example of Health Links to Promote Coordinated Care , 2019, Evaluation & the health professions.

[52]  M. Bigras-Poulin,et al.  A Population Health Surveillance Theory , 2012, Epidemiology and health.

[53]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Big-data analytics framework for incorporating smallholders in sustainable palm oil production , 2017 .

[54]  Javier Sanchez,et al.  Veterinary syndromic surveillance: Current initiatives and potential for development. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[55]  L. Dutil,et al.  Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) Farm Program: Results from Finisher Pig Surveillance , 2010, Zoonoses and public health.

[56]  A. Mankertz,et al.  Spotlight on measles 2010: Measles outbreak among travellers returning from a mass gathering, Germany, September to October 2010. , 2010, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[57]  K. Davies,et al.  The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[58]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social norms as solutions , 2016, Science.

[59]  Anca Draghici,et al.  Organizational knowledge management with Big Data. The foundation of using artificial intelligence , 2017 .

[60]  Philippe Lemoisson,et al.  Un cadre pour la construction interactive de connaissances lors de la conception d’un observatoire des pratiques territoriales , 2012 .

[61]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[62]  Fatimah Lateef,et al.  Syndromic surveillance: A necessary public health tool , 2012, Journal of Acute Disease.

[63]  Edward T Game,et al.  Crowdfunding biodiversity conservation , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[64]  M. Roche,et al.  Web monitoring of emerging animal infectious diseases integrated in the French Animal Health Epidemic Intelligence System , 2018, PloS one.