A neural signature of rapid category-based target selection as a function of intra-item perceptual similarity, despite inter-item dissimilarity

Previous work on visual search has suggested that only a single attentional template can be prioritized at any given point in time. Grouping features into objects and objects into categories can facilitate search performance by maximizing the amount of information carried by an attentional template. From infancy to adulthood, earlier studies on perceptual similarity have shown that consistent features increase the likelihood of grouping features into objects (e.g., Quinn & Bhatt, Psychological Science. 20:933–938, 2009) and objects into categories (e.g., shape bias; Landau, Smith, & Jones, Cognitive Development. 3:299–321, 1988). Here we asked whether lower-level, intra-item similarity facilitates higher-level categorization, despite inter-item dissimilarity. Adults participated in four visual search tasks in which targets were defined as either one item (a specific alien) or a category (any alien) with either similar features (e.g., circle belly shape and circle back spikes) or dissimilar features (e.g., circle belly shape and triangle back spikes). Using behavioral and neural measures (i.e., the N2pc event-related potential component, which typically emerges 200 ms poststimulus), we found that intra-item feature similarity facilitated categorization, despite dissimilar features across the category items. Our results demonstrate that feature similarity builds novel categories and activates a task-appropriate abstract categorical search template. In other words, grouping at the lower, item level facilitates grouping at the higher, category level, which allows us to overcome efficiency limitations in visual search.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  L B Cohen,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[3]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[5]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Semantic Interference in Visual Search , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  From Perceptual Categories to Concepts: What Develops? , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[12]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection , 2009, Psychological science.

[16]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[17]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[18]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Rapid Attentional Selection of Non-native Stimuli despite Perceptual Narrowing , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Perceptual Grouping and Visual Enumeration , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[23]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[24]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Joseph L. Austerweil,et al.  A rational model of the effects of distributional information on feature learning , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Robert L. Goldstone Unitization during category learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General The Role of Object Categories in Hybrid Visual and Memory Search , 2014 .

[28]  Joseph L. Austerweil,et al.  A nonparametric Bayesian framework for constructing flexible feature representations. , 2013, Psychological review.

[29]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  P. Quinn,et al.  Transfer and Scaffolding of Perceptual Grouping Occurs Across Organizing Principles in 3- to 7-Month-Old Infants , 2009, Psychological science.

[32]  Mark R. Blair,et al.  Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning , 2009, Cognition.

[33]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[34]  O. Pascalis,et al.  A Domain-General Theory of the Development of Perceptual Discrimination , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[35]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Infants learn about objects from statistics and people. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[37]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Searching for Something Familiar or Novel: Top–Down Attentional Selection of Specific Items or Object Categories , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Searching through the hierarchy: How level of target categorization affects visual search , 2012, Visual cognition.

[39]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[41]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Visual Working Memory , 2014 .