Comparison of 3-Dimensional Spinal Reconstruction Accuracy: Biplanar Radiographs With EOS Versus Computed Tomography

Study Design: Experimental study for systematic evaluation of 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from low-dose digital stereoradiography. Objective. To assess the accuracy of EOS (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions compared with 3D computed tomography (CT) and the effect spine positioning within the EOS unit has on reconstruction accuracy. Summary of Background Data. Scoliosis is a 3D deformity, but 3D morphological analyses are still rare. A new low-dose radiation digital stereoradiography system (EOS) was previously evaluated for intra/interobserver variability, but data are limited for 3D reconstruction accuracy. Methods. Three synthetic scoliotic phantoms (T1-pelvis) were scanned in upright position at 0°, ±5°, and ±10° of axial rotation within EOS and in supine position using CT. Three-dimensional EOS reconstructions were superimposed on corresponding 3D computed tomographic reconstructions. Shape, position, and orientation accuracy were assessed for each vertebra and the entire spine. Additional routine planer clinical deformity measurements were compared: Cobb angle, kyphosis, lordosis, and pelvic incidence. Results. Mean EOS vertebral body shape accuracy was 1.1 ± 0.2 mm (maximum 4.7 mm), with 95% confidence interval of 1.7 mm. Different anatomical vertebral regions were modeled well with root-mean-square (RMS) values from 1.2 to 1.6 mm. Position and orientation accuracy of each vertebra were high: RMS offset was 1.2 mm (maximum 3.7 mm) and RMS axial rotation was 1.9° (maximum 5.8°). There was no significant difference in each of the analyzed parameters (P > 0.05) associated with varying the rotational position of the phantoms in EOS machine. Planer measurements accuracy was less than 1° mean difference for pelvic incidence, Cobb angle (mean 1.6°/maximum 3.9°), and sagittal kyphosis (mean less than 1°, maximum 4.9°). Conclusion. The EOS image acquisition and reconstruction software provides accurate 3D spinal representations of scoliotic spinal deformities. The results of this study provide spinal deformity surgeons evidence pertaining to this new upright 3D imaging technology that may aid in the clinical diagnosis and decision making for patients with scoliosis.

[1]  David Mitton,et al.  Surgical Correction of Scoliosis by In Situ Contouring: A Detorsion Analysis , 2004, Spine.

[2]  J Dubousset,et al.  [3-dimensional approach to spinal deformities. Application to the study of the prognosis of pediatric scoliosis]. , 1983, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[3]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[4]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Reliability of 3D Reconstruction of the Spine of Mild Scoliotic Patients , 2007, Spine.

[5]  F Lavaste,et al.  Quantification of Three-Dimensional Vertebral Rotations in Scoliosis: What Are the True Values? , 1995, Spine.

[6]  J. A. de Guise,et al.  Analyse infographique des déformations tridimensionnelles des vertèbres scoliotiques , 1997 .

[7]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of Lumbar Lordosis: Centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison Posterior Tangent Methods , 2001, Spine.

[8]  B. S. Richards Measurement Error in Assessment of Vertebral Rotation Using the Perdriolle Torsionmeter , 1992, Spine.

[9]  David Mitton,et al.  3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  W. Skalli,et al.  Validation of the non-stereo corresponding points stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction technique , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  3D reconstruction of the proximal femur with low-dose digital stereoradiography , 2004, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[12]  R. Jackson,et al.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. , 2000, Spine.

[13]  W Skalli,et al.  3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  S. Laporte,et al.  Three-dimensional (3D) detailed reconstruction of human vertebrae from low-dose digital stereoradiography , 2003, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[15]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Diagnostic Imaging of Spinal Deformities: Reducing Patients Radiation Dose With a New Slot-Scanning X-ray Imager , 2010, Spine.

[16]  D. Polly,et al.  Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis: Evaluation of Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Technique Variability , 1996, Spine.

[17]  R Perdriolle,et al.  Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution. , 1987, Orthopedics.

[18]  H Labelle,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Radiographic Comparison of Cotrel–Dubousset and Colorado Instrumentations for the Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2000, Spine.