Internet message boards for pregnancy loss: who's on-line and why?

BACKGROUND Pregnancy loss is common, but its significance is often minimized by family, friends, and the community, leaving bereaved parents with unmet need for support. This study sought to describe demographics, usage patterns, and perceived benefits for women participating in Internet pregnancy loss support groups. METHODS We requested permission to post an anonymous Internet survey on large and active United States Internet message boards for women with miscarriages and stillbirths. The study purposefully oversampled stillbirth sites and included both closed- and open-ended questions. The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board approved the study. Closed-ended questions were summarized and evaluated with bivariate analysis. We performed a qualitative analysis of open-ended data using an iterative coding process to identify key themes. RESULTS Of 62 sites queried, 15 granted permission to post the survey on 18 different message boards. We collected 1,039 surveys, of which 1,006 were complete and eligible for analysis. Women were typically white, well educated, and frequent users. They noted message boards helped them to feel less isolated in their loss and grief and they appreciated unique aspects of Internet communication such as convenience, access, anonymity, and privacy. Pregnancy loss message boards are an important aspect of support for many bereaved mothers. African-American women seem to be substantially underrepresented on-line despite being at higher risk for stillbirth. CONCLUSION Internet message boards serve a unique function in providing support for women with miscarriage and stillbirth. The benefits are often significantly different from those encountered in traditional face-to-face bereavement support.

[1]  J. Powell,et al.  Primary care Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups : systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions , 2004 .

[2]  J. Cacciatore,et al.  Effects of Support Groups on Post Traumatic Stress Responses in Women Experiencing Stillbirth , 2007, Omega.

[3]  P. Kitsantas,et al.  Racial/ethnic disparities in infant mortality , 2010, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[4]  B. Smedley,et al.  Unequal Treatment: Con-fronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care , 2002 .

[5]  L. Hoey,et al.  Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  R. Neugebauer,et al.  Psychological morbidity following miscarriage. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[7]  Lois A. Ritter,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2011 .

[8]  S. Price Prevalence and Correlates of Pregnancy Loss History in a National Sample of Children and Families , 2006, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[9]  P. D. Morgan,et al.  Underrepresentation of African Americans in online cancer support groups. , 2008, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[10]  J. Fernsler,et al.  Young widows' experience with an Internet self-help group. , 2000, Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services.

[11]  J. Mann,et al.  Predicting depressive symptoms and grief after pregnancy loss , 2008, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  I. Leon Helping Families Cope with Perinatal Loss , 2009 .

[13]  Nicholas W. Jankowski,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2006 .

[14]  K. Kavanaugh,et al.  Perinatal loss in low-income African American parents. , 2005, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[15]  G. Eysenbach Correction: Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) , 2012, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[16]  Kathleen Leask Capitulo PERINATAL GRIEF ONLINE , 2004, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[17]  John A. H. Lee Health: United States , 1986 .

[18]  Health information Websites: characteristics of US users by race and ethnicity , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  A. Meléis,et al.  Coping with grief after involuntary pregnancy loss: perspectives of African American women. , 2003, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[20]  Joe Leigh Simpson,et al.  Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies , 1986 .

[21]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[22]  J. Drife,et al.  Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology , 2009 .

[23]  S. Gabbe,et al.  Pocket Companion to Accompany Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies , 2002 .

[24]  T. Götz,et al.  [Study of virtual self help groups after prenatal loss: not being alone in the grief process]. , 2006, Pflege Zeitschrift.

[25]  M. Thearle,et al.  Couple distress after sudden infant or perinatal death: A 30‐month follow up , 2002, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[26]  Sandra L Saperstein,et al.  Using the Internet for Health-Related Activities: Findings From a National Probability Sample , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  D. Côté-Arsenault,et al.  Support Groups Helping Women Through Pregnancies after Loss , 2004, Western journal of nursing research.