Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles

This article first analyzes library and information science (LIS) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information‐service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information‐service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information‐service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.

[1]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Visualizing changes over time: A history of information retrieval through the lens of descriptor tri-occurrence mapping , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[3]  P. Ingwersen Information and Information Science in Context , 1992 .

[4]  ÅströmFredrik Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 19902004 , 2007 .

[5]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Philip Hider,et al.  Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature , 2008 .

[8]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Visualizing Library and Information Science concept spaces through keyword and citation based maps and clusters , 2002 .

[9]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[10]  Mattei Dogan,et al.  Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences. , 1969 .

[11]  Ronald R. Powell,et al.  Basic Research Methods for Librarians , 1985 .

[12]  Birger Hjørland The foundation of the concept of relevance , 2009 .

[13]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  The Visibility of Information Science and Library Science Research in Bibliometric Mapping of the LIS Field , 2010, The Library Quarterly.

[15]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  J. Farradane,et al.  Information Science , 1971, Nature.

[17]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  The foundation of the concept of relevance , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  International Library and Information Science Research: A Comparison of National Trends , 2003 .

[20]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Library and information science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in lisa: Brief Communications , 2008 .

[22]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[23]  Patricia E. Feehan,et al.  Library and Information Science Research: An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature. , 1987 .

[24]  S. Kumpulainen,et al.  Library and Information Science Research in 1975: Content Analysis of the Journal Articles , 1991 .

[25]  M. R. Davarpanah,et al.  A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[26]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Library and information science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in lisa , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science. , 1990 .

[28]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Looking across communicative genres: a call for inclusive indicators of interdisciplinarity , 2011, Scientometrics.

[29]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods , 2000, Inf. Res..

[30]  Bluma C. Peritz,et al.  The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey. , 1980 .

[31]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Lynne McKechnie,et al.  The use of theory in information science research , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995 , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[34]  P. Vakkari Library and Information Science: Its Content and Scope , 1994 .

[35]  L. Buttlar Analyzing the Library Periodical Literature: Content and Authorship. , 1991 .

[36]  Martyvonne M. Nour,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980 , 1985 .

[37]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science , 2012, Scientometrics.

[38]  Jan Nolin,et al.  Turning weakness into strength: strategies for future LIS , 2010, J. Documentation.

[39]  Sung-Jin Kim,et al.  An analysis of the development and use of theory in library and information science research articles , 2006 .

[40]  Fredrik Åström The social and intellectual development of library and information science , 2006 .

[41]  B. Dervin,et al.  Information needs and uses. , 1986 .

[42]  Heidi Julien,et al.  Trends in information behavior research, 1999–2008: A content analysis , 2011 .

[43]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Denise Koufogiannakis,et al.  A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[45]  Jan Nolin,et al.  What's in a turn? , 2007, Inf. Res..

[46]  Bernd Frohmann,et al.  The Power of Images: a Discourse Analysis of the Cognitive Viewpoint , 1992, J. Documentation.

[47]  Stephen E. Atkins Subject Trends in Library and Information Science Research, 1975-1984 , 1988 .

[48]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  The cognitive viewpoint in information science , 1990, J. Inf. Sci..

[49]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Research trends in library and information science in India , 1995 .

[50]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..