Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology

Abstract The unique properties of nanomaterials and structures and also production technologies on the nanometer scale are associated with presumably revolutionary contributions to sustainable development in terms of resource efficiency or health care. The obvious benefits and potentials are currently neither substantiated by an assessment of ecological and human health risks nor by a holistic assessment of all aspects along the life cycle of nano based products and services. Little work has been done, so far, to compare, e.g., the efforts of material production and recycling with the benefits in the use phase beyond economic considerations. In order to ease the application of life cycle thinking in the nanotechnology domain functions, materials and impacts have to be described adequately. Due to the lack of relevant data and the heterogeneity of current life cycle based studies it is recommended to carefully adjust environmental prospects to the system under study. Regarding the life cycle performance of the materials used the efforts in realizing nano functionalities, properties and recycling gain decisive importance to counterbalance obvious advantages in the use phase. The assessment of potential risks for the environment and human health due to intended and also accidental releases are still not possible in LCA, but should nevertheless be supported by a thorough description of potential releases. All these observations are discussed by means of two case studies, one on PVD coating and one on a CNT-based FED screen in order to substantiate and illustrate the need for a framework to harmonise existing, ongoing and future LCA applications in this field.

[1]  Patrick Wäger,et al.  Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective?: The environmental impacts of the Swiss take-back and recycling systems for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) , 2005 .

[2]  Nigel J Walker,et al.  Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part II: toxicological and safety evaluation of nanomaterials, current challenges and data needs. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Nanopartikel unter der Lupe , 2004 .

[4]  Harald F. Krug.  Auswirkungen nanotechnologischer Entwicklungen auf die Umwelt , 2005 .

[5]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Comparative study of ITO layers deposited by DC and RF magnetron sputtering at room temperature , 2006 .

[6]  N. Englert.  Fine particles and human health--a review of epidemiological studies. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[7]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[8]  Lester B Lave,et al.  Life cycle economic and environmental implications of using nanocomposites in automobiles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[10]  M. Dresselhaus.  Carbon nanotubes , 1995 .

[11]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[12]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles , 2006 .

[13]  Jianming Zhou.  Indium tin oxide (ITO) deposition, patterning and Schottky contact fabrication , 2006 .

[14]  Torsten Fleischer,et al.  Nanotechnologie. Forschung, Entwicklung, Anwendung , 2004 .

[15]  W. Bainbridge,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2001 .

[16]  Karluss Thomas,et al.  Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, Part I: evaluating the human health implications of exposure to nanoscale materials. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  T. Fleischer.  Technikfolgenabschätzungen zur Nanotechnologie - Inhaltliche und konzeptionelle Überlegungen , 2002 .

[18]  O. Park,et al.  The evolution of the structural, electrical and optical properties in indium-tin-oxide thin film on glass substrate by DC reactive magnetron sputtering , 2006 .

[19]  M. L. Healy,et al.  Economic and Environmental Tradeoffs in SWNT Production , 2006 .

[20]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Establishing Life Cycle Inventories of Chemicals Based on Differing Data Availability (9 pp) , 2005 .

[21]  Tina Masciangioli,et al.  Environmental technologies at the nanoscale. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Life cycle benefits of using nanotechnology to stabilize platinum-group metal particles in automotive catalysts. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  H. Czternastek,et al.  Modified procedure for deposition of ITO films by DC sputtering , 1985 .

[24]  P. Avouris,et al.  Nanotubes for electronics. , 2000, Scientific American.

[25]  W. Luther.  Nanotechnologie als Wirtschaftlicher Wachstumsmarkt , 2007 .

[26]  Konrad Saur,et al.  Draft final report of the LCM definition study , 2003 .

[27]  Jonathan G. Overly,et al.  Environmental life-cycle impacts of CRT and LCD desktop computer displays , 2005 .

[28]  A. Burden.  Materials for field emission displays , 2001 .

[29]  P. Schwarze,et al.  Chemical composition and not only total surface area is important for the effects of ultrafine particles. , 2006, Mutation research.

[30]  A. Alec Talin,et al.  Field emission displays: a critical review , 2001 .

[31]  Fate of inhaled particles after interaction with the lung surface. , 2006, Paediatric respiratory reviews.

[32]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.