Continuous daily assessment of multiple sclerosis disability using remote step count monitoring

Disability measures in multiple sclerosis (MS) rely heavily on ambulatory function, and current metrics fail to capture potentially important variability in walking behavior. We sought to determine whether remote step count monitoring using a consumer-friendly accelerometer (Fitbit Flex) can enhance MS disability assessment. 99 adults with relapsing or progressive MS able to walk ≥2-min were prospectively recruited. At 4 weeks, study retention was 97% and median Fitbit use was 97% of days. Substudy validation resulted in high interclass correlations between Fitbit, ActiGraph and manual step count tally during a 2-minute walk test, and between Fitbit and ActiGraph (ICC = 0.76) during 7-day home monitoring. Over 4 weeks of continuous monitoring, daily steps were lower in progressive versus relapsing MS (mean difference 2546 steps, p < 0.01). Lower average daily step count was associated with greater disability on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (p < 0.001). Within each EDSS category, substantial variability in step count was apparent (i.e., EDSS = 6.0 range 1097–7152). Step count demonstrated moderate-strong correlations with other walking measures. Lower average daily step count is associated with greater MS disability and captures important variability in real-world walking activity otherwise masked by standard disability scales, including the EDSS. These results support remote step count monitoring as an exploratory outcome in MS trials.

[1]  S. Elliott,et al.  Patient reported outcomes measures in neurogenic bladder and bowel: A systematic review of the current literature , 2016, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[2]  D. Allen,et al.  Remote Physical Activity Monitoring in Neurological Disease: A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[4]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  Remote Tracking of Walking Activity in MS Patients in a Real-World Setting (P3.209) , 2015 .

[5]  Pierre J. Vinken,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis and Other Demyelinating Diseases , 1970 .

[6]  Muna Shakeeb Tawfiq Rating Neurological Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis , 2016 .

[7]  R. Motl,et al.  Steps per day among persons with multiple sclerosis: variation by demographic, clinical, and device characteristics. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  R. Klaren,et al.  Objectively quantified physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  How Many Steps/Day Are Enough? Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health , 2004 .

[10]  R. Motl,et al.  Clinical Importance of Steps Taken per Day among Persons with Multiple Sclerosis , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  A J Thompson,et al.  Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability , 2003, Neurology.

[12]  E. McAuley,et al.  Longitudinal Change in Physical Activity and Its Correlates in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[13]  Carlo Pozzilli,et al.  Assessing walking disability in multiple sclerosis , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[14]  Julia M Balto,et al.  Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical.

[15]  Deborah M. Miller,et al.  Recent developments in the assessment of quality of life in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[16]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[17]  J. Hobart,et al.  Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  J. Vissing,et al.  Two- and 6-minute walk tests assess walking capability equally in neuromuscular diseases , 2016, Neurology.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[20]  A. John,et al.  A Large-Scale Study of Anxiety and Depression in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Survey via the Web Portal of the UK MS Register , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  R. Klaren,et al.  Validity of Minimal Clinically Important Difference Values for the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12? , 2014, European Neurology.

[22]  D. Wade,et al.  Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  T. Marrie,et al.  Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. , 1994, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[24]  R. Motl,et al.  Commercially available accelerometry as an ecologically valid measure of ambulation in individuals with multiple sclerosis , 2012, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[25]  R. Motl,et al.  Energy Cost of Walking and Its Association With Gait Parameters, Daily Activity, and Fatigue in Persons With Mild Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  Robert W Motl,et al.  Accelerometry and its association with objective markers of walking limitations in ambulatory adults with multiple sclerosis. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  I. Piña,et al.  Statement on exercise. Benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. A statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart association. , 1992, Circulation.

[28]  Robert W Motl,et al.  Reactivity in baseline accelerometer data from a physical activity behavioral intervention. , 2012, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[29]  I. Piña,et al.  Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. A statement for health professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. , 1996, Circulation.

[30]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[31]  Brian M. Sandroff,et al.  Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  R. Motl,et al.  Leg Spasticity and Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis , 2014, Multiple sclerosis international.

[33]  R. Motl,et al.  Accelerometry as a measure of walking behavior in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[34]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[35]  C. M. Wiles,et al.  Quantified measurement of activity provides insight into motor function and recovery in neurological disease , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[36]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[37]  C. Pozzilli,et al.  Assessing walking disability in multiple sclerosis.Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):914-24. doi: 10.1177/1352458512444498. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Review. , 2012 .

[38]  U. Dalgas,et al.  Exercise and disease progression in multiple sclerosis: can exercise slow down the progression of multiple sclerosis? , 2012, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[39]  L. Dibble,et al.  Ambulatory Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis , 2011, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[40]  F. Jacques Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions , 2015, Neurology.