The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence

Over what region of space are horizontal disparities integrated to form the stimulus for vergence? The vergence system might be expected to respond to disparities within a small area of interest to bring them into the range of precise stereoscopic processing. However, the literature suggests that disparities are integrated over a fairly large parafoveal area. We report the results of six experiments designed to explore the spatial characteristics of the stimulus for vergence. Binocular eye movements were recorded using magnetic search coils. Each dichoptic display consisted of a central target stimulus that the subject attempted to fuse, and a competing stimulus with conflicting disparity. In some conditions the target was stationary, providing a fixation stimulus. In other conditions, the disparity of the target changed to provide a vergence-tracking stimulus. The target and competing stimulus were combined in a variety of conditions including those in which (1) a transparent textured-disc target was superimposed on a competing textured background, (2) a textured-disc target filled the centre of a competing annular background, and (3) a small target was presented within the centre of a competing annular background of various inner diameters. In some conditions the target and competing stimulus were separated in stereoscopic depth. The results are consistent with a disparity integration area with a diameter of about 5°. Stimuli beyond this integration area can drive vergence in their own right, but they do not appear to be summed or averaged with a central stimulus to form a combined disparity signal. A competing stimulus had less effect on vergence when separated from the target by a disparity pedestal. As a result, we propose that it may be more useful to think in terms of an integration volume for vergence rather than a two-dimensional retinal integration area.

[1]  G. Baumgartner,et al.  Disparity sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in the cat striate cortex , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. Semmlow,et al.  Vergence control of central and peripheral disparities , 1991, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  H. Mallot,et al.  Disparity-evoked Vergence is Driven by Interocular Correlation , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  I. Howard,et al.  Cycloversion and cyclovergence: the effects of the area and position of the visual display , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  S P McKee,et al.  Stereogram design for testing local stereopsis. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  E. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias , 2003, Vision Research.

[7]  David R. Pope,et al.  Luminance, contrast and spatial-frequency tuning of the transient-vergence system , 1998, Vision Research.

[8]  D. R. Hampton,et al.  Fusional vergence response to local peripheral stimulation. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[10]  Lawrence K. Cormack,et al.  Disparity tuning in mechanisms of human stereopsis , 1992, Vision Research.

[11]  I. Howard,et al.  Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  C Busettini,et al.  Short-latency disparity vergence in humans. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  I. Howard,et al.  Seeing in depth, Vol. 2: Depth perception. , 2002 .

[14]  Scott B Stevenson,et al.  The effect of target size and eccentricity on reflex disparity vergence , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  A. Parker,et al.  Binocular Neurons in V1 of Awake Monkeys Are Selective for Absolute, Not Relative, Disparity , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Stevenson,et al.  The influence of subject instruction on horizontal and vertical vergence tracking , 1997, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Parker,et al.  Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  David R. Pope,et al.  Orientation and luminance polarity tuning of the transient-vergence system , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  John M. Findlay,et al.  The area of spatial integration for initial horizontal disparity vergence , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Badcock,et al.  Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 1995 .

[22]  R Jones,et al.  Horizontal fusional amplitudes. Evidence for disparity tuning. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  R. S Allison,et al.  Depth selectivity of vertical fusional mechanisms , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[25]  J E WINKELMAN.  Peripheral fusion. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  D. Glaser,et al.  Depth discrimination of a crowded line is better when it is more luminant than the lines crowding it , 1995, Vision Research.

[28]  D. A. Owens,et al.  The accuracy of binocular vergence for peripheral stimuli , 1983, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Winkelman.  Central and peripheral fusion. , 1953, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  I. P. Howard,et al.  Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Hermann M. Burian,et al.  FUSIONAL MOVEMENTS: ROLE OF PERIPHERAL RETINAL STIMULI , 1939 .

[32]  C. Schor,et al.  Envelope size-tuning for transient disparity vergence , 2001, Vision Research.