Cutting Corners in Theory of Mind ⋆

Theory of Mind (ToM) research is concerned with the fundamental social ability of cognitively repre-senting other people’s mental states. In the context of designing intuitive, human-like, and collaborative artificial intelligence (AI), ToM is becoming increasingly relevant to AI researchers. However, there is a missing link between the theoretical and empirical approaches to ToM in Psychology and the applied but theory- and evidence-distant work in Computer Science. This work aims to connect the understandings and aims of both fields. A dual-process theory driven framework was adopted, distinguishing between higher-level and lower-level processes. Participants saw a virtual agent’s movement in a maze with either a full egocentric cue, a partial egocentric cue, or no egocentric cue. They were asked to predict the agent’s next actions and give verbal explanations for their predictions. Results show a strong sensitivity to egocentric information. Moreover, the qualitative responses show large individual differences not reflected in the recordings of participants’ decisions. The mechanisms contributing to efficient and flexible ToM and their implications for applied ToM in AI are considered and discussed. The value of qualitative research in this subject area is highlighted.

[1]  Yi Zeng,et al.  A Brain-Inspired Model of Theory of Mind , 2020, Frontiers in Neurorobotics.

[2]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  What Do Theory-of-Mind Tasks Actually Measure? Theory and Practice , 2020, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[3]  T. Burge Do infants and nonhuman animals attribute mental states? , 2018, Psychological review.

[4]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Reading Your Mind While You Are Reading—Evidence for Spontaneous Visuospatial Perspective Taking During a Semantic Categorization Task , 2018, Psychological science.

[5]  Peter Stone,et al.  Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems , 2017, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Chris L. Baker,et al.  Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[7]  N. Sebanz,et al.  When do humans spontaneously adopt another's visuospatial perspective? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Donald W. Pfaff,et al.  Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Alison Wood Brooks,et al.  Anxious and egocentric: how specific emotions influence perspective taking. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Kibum Kim,et al.  Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study , 2011, Science.

[12]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Ian A Apperly,et al.  Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? , 2009, Psychological review.

[14]  G. Glover,et al.  Cultural and linguistic effects on neural bases of ‘Theory of Mind’ in American and Japanese children , 2007, Brain Research.

[15]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  PsychSim: Modeling Theory of Mind with Decision-Theoretic Agents , 2005, IJCAI.

[16]  A. Caspi,et al.  Origins of individual differences in theory of mind: from nature to nurture? , 2005, Child development.

[17]  D. Barr,et al.  Limits on theory of mind use in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[18]  H. Wimmer,et al.  “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children ☆ , 1985 .

[19]  D. Premack,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  D. Howe Knowing other Minds , 2006 .

[21]  David V. Pynadath,et al.  PsychSim: Agent-based Modeling of Social Interactions and Influence , 2004, ICCM.

[22]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[23]  Edmund H. Durfee,et al.  A Rigorous, Operational Formalization of Recursive Modeling , 1995, ICMAS.