Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—round IX

This article is an introduction to the special issue of the journal PROTEINS, dedicated to the ninth Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment to assess the state of the art in protein structure modeling. The article describes the conduct of the experiment, the categories of prediction included, and outlines the evaluation and assessment procedures. Methods for modeling protein structure continue to advance, although at a more modest pace than in the early CASP experiments. CASP developments of note are indications of improvement in model accuracy for some classes of target, an improved ability to choose the most accurate of a set of generated models, and evidence of improvement in accuracy for short “new fold” models. In addition, a new analysis of regions of models not derivable from the most obvious template structure has revealed better performance than expected. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Cyrus Levinthal Comment: “Dry” enzymes , 1986 .

[2]  Klaus Gubernator,et al.  The construction of new proteins: V. A template‐assembled synthetic protein (TASP) containing both a 4‐helix bundle and β‐barrel‐like structure , 1989, Proteins.

[3]  C. Sander,et al.  Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins , 1994, Proteins.

[4]  K Fidelis,et al.  A large‐scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods , 1995, Proteins.

[5]  F E Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of current techniques for Ab initio protein structure prediction , 1995, Proteins.

[6]  E Pennisi Teams Tackle Protein Prediction , 1996, Science.

[7]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Murzin,et al.  Sequences and topology: Predicting evolution. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  S H Bryant,et al.  A measure of success in fold recognition. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  D Shortle Structure prediction: Folding proteins by pattern recognition , 1997, Current Biology.

[11]  D. Eisenberg Into the black of night , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[12]  David C. Jones,et al.  Progress in protein structure prediction. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[13]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round III , 1999, Proteins.

[14]  S. Bryant,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round II , 1997, Proteins.

[15]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Meeting review: the Second meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996. , 1997, Folding & design.

[16]  C Venclovas,et al.  Criteria for evaluating protein structures derived from comparative modeling , 1997, Proteins.

[17]  M. Levitt,et al.  Protein folding: the endgame. , 1997, Annual review of biochemistry.

[18]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)‐round V , 2003, Proteins.

[19]  B. Rost,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round 6 , 2005, Proteins.

[20]  Adam Zemla,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)‐round V , 2005, Proteins.

[21]  B. Rost,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round 6 , 2005 .

[22]  Maciej Milostan,et al.  CASP6 data processing and automatic evaluation at the protein structure prediction center , 2005, Proteins.

[23]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction—Round VII , 2007, Proteins.

[24]  Andreas Prlic,et al.  New tools and expanded data analysis capabilities at the protein structure prediction center , 2007, Proteins.

[25]  B. Rost,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction—Round VIII , 2009, Proteins.

[26]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  Protein structure prediction center in CASP8 , 2009, Proteins.

[27]  Burkhard Rost,et al.  Evaluation of template‐based models in CASP8 with standard measures , 2009, Proteins.

[28]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.

[29]  N. Grishin,et al.  CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions , 2011, Proteins.

[30]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  Assessment of ligand‐binding residue predictions in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.

[31]  Mark J van Raaij,et al.  Target highlights in CASP9: Experimental target structures for the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction , 2011, Proteins.

[32]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  CASP9 results compared to those of previous casp experiments , 2011, Proteins.

[33]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.

[34]  A. Tramontano,et al.  Evaluation of residue–residue contact predictions in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.

[35]  Matthew P Jacobson,et al.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.