Sustainable management of a river basin by integrating an improved fuzzy based hybridized SWOT model and geo-statistical weighted thematic overlay analysis

Abstract Sustainable river basin planning and management is a complex and uncertain phenomenon involving social, economic, environmental and several technical criteria. Despite global advancement, the problems associated sustainability have not been sufficiently addressed, due to mismanaged governance, poorly implemented policies, lack of suitable data and over-exploitation of river resources. Therefore, major rivers basins across the globe need an integrative and comprehensive strategic approach considering the diverse stakeholder’s perspective and conflicting criteria pertaining to sustainable management. The present study develops a decision support framework to assess the sustainability by coupling an improved fuzzy based hybridized strength-weakness-opportunities and threats model (FH-SWOT) with a geostatistical approach. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the model Ganges river basin, India has been taken as a case study. The novelty of the study is to devise six different hybrid mechanisms under FH-SWOT framework to reach best possible strategic alternatives along with nominal, optimistic and pessimistic perspectives of the stakeholders. To enhance the model’s productivity, it is coupled with weighted overlay geo-statistical approach to identify/prioritize the most vulnerable/critical locations, which needs suitable implementation of strategic alternatives derived using FH-SWOT model. The FH-SWOT model developed herein simultaneously delineates strategic alternatives and corresponding priority zones, while addressing the uncertainties related to stakeholder’s conflicts and imprecise data to reach optimal, pessimistic and nominal viewpoints, which leads to development of an innovative and comprehensive decision-support framework for assessing sustainability. The key policies derived from the study involve enforcing regulations on disposal of heavy metals, developing hydropower, adaptation of organic farming, education and participation of stakeholders, regulations on dams and barrages with a score of 0.2453, 0.2205, 0.2088, 0.1898, and 0.1288 respectively. Also, Kanpur- Varanasi stretch has been delineated as very high priority zone followed by regions located along the banks of Ganges. Sensitivity analysis proves that the model is robust and can be used by the environment managers towards sustainable planning and management of any river basin, lakes, wetlands or any major water body of the world.

[1]  I Mergias,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  N. Kundu,et al.  Integrated action planning for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of highland aquatic resources: evaluating outcomes for the Beijiang River, China , 2016 .

[3]  R. McDonnell Challenges for Integrated Water Resources Management: How Do We Provide the Knowledge to Support Truly Integrated Thinking? , 2008 .

[4]  Jennifer Bellamy,et al.  Understanding enabling capacities for managing the 'wicked problem' of nonpoint source water pollution in catchments: a conceptual framework. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Yashwant B. Katpatal,et al.  A GIS Based Design of Groundwater Level Monitoring Network Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Geostatistical Method , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[6]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Assessment of River Water Quality Based on Theory of Variable Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Binary Comparison Method , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[7]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  An integrated fuzzy-based advanced eutrophication simulation model to develop the best management scenarios for a river basin , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  Hassan Tsenbeya Ishaku,et al.  Complementing Water Supply through Rainwater Harvesting in Some Selected Villages of Sahel Savannah Ecological Zone in Borno State Northeastern Nigeria , 2013 .

[9]  Bodil Liedberg Jönsson Stakeholder participation as a tool for sustainable development in the Em River Basin , 2004 .

[10]  Ronita Bardhan,et al.  Applying fuzzy logic to open data for sustainable development decision-making: a case study of the planned city Amaravati , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[11]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  A Scenario Based Impact Assessment of Trace Metals on Ecosystem of River Ganges Using Multivariate Analysis Coupled with Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[12]  Neeraj Agarwal,et al.  IMPACT OF TANNERIES ON GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION IN UNNAO DISTRICT , 2016 .

[13]  Chao Zhou,et al.  Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP , 2013, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[14]  Xiaosheng Qin,et al.  A Sequential Fuzzy Model with General-Shaped Parameters for Water Supply–Demand Analysis , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[15]  H. E. Júnez-Ferreira,et al.  A geostatistical methodology for the optimal design of space–time hydraulic head monitoring networks and its application to the Valle de Querétaro aquifer , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[16]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  Impact assessment of industrial wastewater discharge in a river basin using interval-valued fuzzy group decision-making and spatial approach , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[18]  P. Driessen,et al.  Assessing the Governance Capacity of Cities to Address Challenges of Water, Waste, and Climate Change , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[19]  Anna Menció,et al.  Analyzing Hydrological Sustainability Through Water Balance , 2010, Environmental Management.

[20]  Paul Jeffrey,et al.  Time to Talk? How the Structure of Dialog Processes Shapes Stakeholder Learning in Participatory Water Resources Management , 2012 .

[21]  Jee-Hyong Lee,et al.  A method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making , 1999, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[22]  M. Paoletti,et al.  Environmental Impact of Different Agricultural Management Practices: Conventional vs. Organic Agriculture , 2011 .

[23]  Rui Xia,et al.  A GIS-supported fuzzy-set approach for flood risk assessment , 2014 .

[24]  Yang Liu,et al.  Role of biodiversity in the biogeochemical processes at the water-sediment interface of macroporous river bed: An experimental approach , 2017 .

[25]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  Assessment of air quality in Haora River basin using fuzzy multiple-attribute decision making techniques , 2017, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[26]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  Water quality assessment of a river basin under fuzzy multi-criteria framework , 2015 .

[27]  Xiaosheng Qin,et al.  Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis , 2011, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[28]  Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib,et al.  Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran) , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[29]  Ashantha Goonetilleke,et al.  Water Resources Management: Innovation and Challenges in a Changing World , 2017 .

[30]  Ajit Pratap Singh,et al.  Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna: An interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach , 2007 .

[31]  P P Mujumdar,et al.  An imprecise fuzzy risk approach for water quality management of a river system. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  Mohammad Karamouz,et al.  Development of a Master Plan for Water Pollution Control Using MCDM Techniques: A Case Study , 2003 .

[33]  S. Rakhmatullaev,et al.  Transformation of water management in Central Asia: from State-centric, hydraulic mission to socio-political control , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[34]  B. Bryan,et al.  Quantifying and Exploring Strategic Regional Priorities for Managing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Given Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives , 2010, Ecosystems.

[35]  Yannis A. Phillis,et al.  Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic , 2001 .

[36]  Saurabh Mishra,et al.  Estimation of water pollution and probability of health risk due to imbalanced nutrients in River Ganga, India , 2017 .

[37]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Evaluating water reuse applications under uncertainty: generalized intuitionistic fuzzy-based approach , 2018, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[38]  Simona Tondelli,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Ankit Modi,et al.  Eco-geomorphological approach for environmental flows assessment in monsoon-driven highland rivers: A case study of Upper Ganga, India , 2017 .

[40]  Henry Musoke Semakula,et al.  SWOT Analysis and Challenges of Nile Basin Initiative: An Integrated Water Resource Management Perspective , 2010 .

[41]  Azadeh Ahmadi,et al.  Integrated river basin planning and management: a case study of the Zayandehrud River basin, Iran , 2013 .

[42]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  A Reliability Analysis of a Rainfall Harvesting System in Southern Italy , 2016 .