The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity

The main theories of biodiversity either neglect species interactions or assume that species interact randomly with each other. However, recent empirical work has revealed that ecological networks are highly structured, and the lack of a theory that takes into account the structure of interactions precludes further assessment of the implications of such network patterns for biodiversity. Here we use a combination of analytical and empirical approaches to quantify the influence of network architecture on the number of coexisting species. As a case study we consider mutualistic networks between plants and their animal pollinators or seed dispersers. These networks have been found to be highly nested, with the more specialist species interacting only with proper subsets of the species that interact with the more generalist. We show that nestedness reduces effective interspecific competition and enhances the number of coexisting species. Furthermore, we show that a nested network will naturally emerge if new species are more likely to enter the community where they have minimal competitive load. Nested networks seem to occur in many biological and social contexts, suggesting that our results are relevant in a wide range of fields.

[1]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[2]  Michael Lässig,et al.  Biodiversity in model ecosystems, II: species assembly and food web structure. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[4]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  P. A. Rikvold,et al.  Punctuated equilibria and 1/f noise in a biological coevolution model with individual-based dynamics. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  George Sugihara,et al.  Ecology for bankers , 2008 .

[7]  Stephen Jones,et al.  Mutualism Promotes Diversity and Stability in a Simple Artificial Ecosystem , 2002, Artificial Life.

[8]  K. Tokita,et al.  Emergence of a complex and stable network in a model ecosystem with extinction and mutation. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The merits of neutral theory. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  T. Okuyama,et al.  Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[11]  Donald L DeAngelis,et al.  Comment on "Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance" , 2006, Science.

[12]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[13]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[14]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[15]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[18]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[19]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Patterns of relative species abundance in rainforests and coral reefs , 2007, Nature.

[20]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[21]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Habitat loss and the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[22]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[23]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Michael Lässig,et al.  Biodiversity in model ecosystems, I: coexistence conditions for competing species. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks , 2009, Nature.

[27]  Sérgio Furtado dos Reis,et al.  The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees? , 2007, Biology Letters.

[28]  D. Wright A Simple, Stable Model of Mutualism Incorporating Handling Time , 1989, The American Naturalist.