A Stable Autoregressive Moving Average Hysteresis Model in Flexure Fast Tool Servo Control

Due to the excellent advantages of high speed and high precision, fast tool servo (FTS) system driven by piezoelectric actuators has great attraction for high-quality machining of microstructural array. However, its complex hysteresis nonlinearity at high speed will greatly affect the accuracy and stability of FTS system. Therefore, a stable autoregressive moving average (SARMA) model is proposed in this paper, which aims to describe the dynamic hysteresis nonlinearity accurately. First, a long autoregressive model residual calculation method is used to determine the order of the model and test the applicability of the model. Then, according to the Lyapunov stability theory, the strict stability analysis of the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is carried out in theory. By introducing the relaxation factor to transform the stability condition, the Lagrange multiplier and best square approximation method are applied to enhance the performance of the traditional ARMA model. Aiming at the difficulty of displacement sensor integration in FTS closed-loop controlling system, a hysteresis-compensated direct feedforward control strategy based on the proposed SARMA model is designed. Finally, a series of high-frequency trajectory tracking and comparing experiments has been carried out successfully with the traditional Prandtl–Ishlinskii (PI) and SARMA models to verify the effectiveness and superiority of the method. All results uniformly indicate that the SARMA model is nearly 20 times higher than the traditional PI model in terms of control accuracy and linearity, while the average linearity of FTS’s dynamic tracking control is kept within 0.43% (265 nm), the stroke is 280 $\mu \text{m}$ , and the positioning bandwidth is achieved up to 200 Hz. Note to Practitioners—With the purpose to effectively improve the positioning accuracy for the piezoelectric-actuated fast tool servo mechanism, a hysteresis model with accurate description performance should be established for the further motion control. Therefore, a stable autoregressive moving average model is proposed in this paper. The strict stability analysis of the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is carried out using the Lyapunov stability theory. A relaxation factor is introduced to transform the stability condition, the best square approximation method is applied to enhance the performance of the traditional ARMA model. Combining with the established hysteresis model, a series of tracking control tests is successfully conducted. Comparing to the traditional Prandtl–Ishlinskii model, the FTS’s motion accuracy is greatly improved by 20 times. The fast tool servo system has the capability to achieve millimeter stroke and nanometer scale precision, since its performance can be further improved by using other actuators and sensors with larger travel range and higher resolution. In summary, its potential applications will be promising.

[1]  Shaocheng Tong,et al.  Observer-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Tracking Control of MIMO Stochastic Nonlinear Systems With Unknown Control Directions and Unknown Dead Zones , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and compensating the dynamic hysteresis of piezoelectric actuators via a modified rate-dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii model , 2015 .

[3]  Micky Rakotondrabe Classical Prandtl-Ishlinskii modeling and inverse multiplicative structure to compensate hysteresis in piezoactuators , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[4]  Yangmin Li,et al.  A New Flexure-Based $Y\theta$ Nanomanipulator With Nanometer-Scale Resolution and Millimeter-Scale Workspace , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  Xu Yang,et al.  Design and Adaptive Terminal Sliding Mode Control of a Fast Tool Servo System for Diamond Machining of Freeform Surfaces , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  Development of Reduced Preisach Model Using Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  A. Immanuel Selvakumar,et al.  Linear and non-linear autoregressive models for short-term wind speed forecasting , 2016 .

[8]  Yung-Tien Liu,et al.  A 3-axis precision positioning device using PZT actuators with low interference motions , 2016 .

[9]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  High-Bandwidth Control of Nanopositioning Stages via an Inner-Loop Delayed Position Feedback , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[10]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  A novel multi-time-scale modeling for electric power demand forecasting: From short-term to medium-term horizon , 2017 .

[11]  Ping Yang,et al.  Pseudo-Hammerstein model based identification for rate-dependent hysteresis , 2014, Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[12]  Sergej Fatikow,et al.  Modeling and Control of Piezo-Actuated Nanopositioning Stages: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[13]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  Compensation of rate-dependent hysteresis nonlinearities in a magnetostrictive actuator using an inverse Prandtl–Ishlinskii model , 2013 .

[14]  Xun Chen,et al.  Development and Repetitive-Compensated PID Control of a Nanopositioning Stage With Large-Stroke and Decoupling Property , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Yue Wang,et al.  Decentralized Adaptive Neural Approximated Inverse Control for a Class of Large-Scale Nonlinear Hysteretic Systems With Time Delays , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[16]  Suet To,et al.  Design, Analysis, and Realization of a Novel Piezoelectrically Actuated Rotary Spatial Vibration System for Micro-/Nanomachining , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  Meiying Ye,et al.  Hysteresis and nonlinearity compensation of relative humidity sensor using support vector machines , 2008 .

[18]  Yanling Tian,et al.  A Novel Direct Inverse Modeling Approach for Hysteresis Compensation of Piezoelectric Actuator in Feedforward Applications , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[19]  Y. Cao,et al.  A Novel Discrete ARMA-Based Model for Piezoelectric Actuator Hysteresis , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[20]  Fengzhou Fang,et al.  Machining approach of freeform optics on infrared materials via ultra-precision turning. , 2017, Optics express.

[21]  Junzhi Yu,et al.  An Inversion-Free Predictive Controller for Piezoelectric Actuators Based on a Dynamic Linearized Neural Network Model , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[22]  Hui Tang,et al.  Design and control of a new 3-PUU fast tool servo for complex microstructure machining , 2018 .

[23]  Yue Wang,et al.  Adaptive Estimated Inverse Output-Feedback Quantized Control for Piezoelectric Positioning Stage , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[24]  Micky Rakotondrabe,et al.  Bouc–Wen Modeling and Inverse Multiplicative Structure to Compensate Hysteresis Nonlinearity in Piezoelectric Actuators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[25]  Tianyou Chai,et al.  Compensation of Hysteresis Nonlinearity in Magnetostrictive Actuators With Inverse Multiplicative Structure for Preisach Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[26]  Yangmin Li,et al.  Feedforward nonlinear PID control of a novel micromanipulator using Preisach hysteresis compensator , 2015 .

[27]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Compensation of Asymmetric Hysteresis Nonlinearity for Piezoceramic Actuators With a Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[28]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Non-symmetrical Bouc–Wen model for piezoelectric ceramic actuators , 2012 .

[29]  Yonghong Tan,et al.  Modeling hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators using NARMAX models , 2009 .