Exploring sequence/folding space: folding studies on multiple hydrophobic core mutants of ubiquitin.

The stability, dynamic, and structural properties of ubiquitin and two multiple hydrophobic core mutants were studied. One of the mutants (U4) has seven substitutions in the hydrophobic core (M1L, I3L, V5I, I13F, L15V, V17M, and V26L). On average, its side chains are larger than the wild-type, and it can thus be thought of as having an overpacked core. The other mutant (U7) has two substitutions (I3V and I13V). On average, it has smaller side chains than the wild-type, and it can therefore be considered to be underpacked. The three proteins are well-folded and show similar backbone dynamics (T(1), T(2), and HNOE values), indicating that the regular secondary structure extends over the same residue ranges. The crystallographic structure of U4 was determined. The final R(factor) and R(free) are 0.198 and 0.248, respectively, at 2.18 A resolution. The structure of U4 is very similar to wild-type ubiquitin. Remarkably, there are almost no changes in the positions of the C(alpha) atoms along the entire backbone, and the hydrogen-bonding network is maintained. The mutations of the hydrophobic core are accommodated by small movements of side chains in the core of mutated and nonmutated residues. Unfolding and refolding kinetic studies revealed that U4 unfolds with the highest rates; however, its refolding rate constants are very similar to those of the wild-type protein. Conversely, U7 seems to be the most destabilized protein; its refolding rate constant is smaller than the other two proteins. This was confirmed by stopped-flow techniques and by H/D exchange methodologies. This work illustrates the possibility of repacking the hydrophobic core of small proteins and has important implications in the de novo design of stable proteins.

[1]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Removal of surface charge‐charge interactions from ubiquitin leaves the protein folded and very stable , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  S. T. Thomas,et al.  Contribution of the 30/36 hydrophobic contact at the C-terminus of the alpha-helix to the stability of the ubiquitin molecule. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[3]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Contribution of surface salt bridges to protein stability: guidelines for protein engineering. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  G. A. Lazar,et al.  Solution structure and dynamics of a designed hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin. , 1999, Structure.

[5]  Terrence G. Oas,et al.  The energy landscape of a fast-folding protein mapped by Ala→Gly Substitutions , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[6]  G. A. Lazar,et al.  De novo design of the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  D N Woolfson,et al.  Core-directed protein design. I. An experimental method for selecting stable proteins from combinatorial libraries. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[8]  H. Roder,et al.  Early hydrogen-bonding events in the folding reaction of ubiquitin. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Alex Kentsis,et al.  D/H amide kinetic isotope effects reveal when hydrogen bonds form during protein folding , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  A. D. Robertson,et al.  Kinetics of unfolding and folding from amide hydrogen exchange in native ubiquitin , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  S. Khorasanizadeh,et al.  Folding and stability of a tryptophan-containing mutant of ubiquitin. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[12]  George I. Makhatadze,et al.  Hydration of the peptide backbone largely defines the thermodynamic propensity scale of residues at the C′ position of the C-capping box of α-helices , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  P. J. Kraulis,et al.  ANSIG: A program for the assignment of protein 1H 2D NMR spectra by interactive computer graphics , 1989, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969).

[14]  T. Sosnick,et al.  Distinguishing between two-state and three-state models for ubiquitin folding. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[15]  P. A. Evans,et al.  Structure of very early protein folding intermediates: new insights through a variant of hydrogen exchange labelling. , 1996, Folding & design.

[16]  S. Fesik,et al.  Heteronuclear three-dimensional nmr spectroscopy. A strategy for the simplification of homonuclear two-dimensional NMR spectra , 1988 .

[17]  A. Fersht,et al.  The changing nature of the protein folding transition state: implications for the shape of the free-energy profile for folding. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  G N Murshudov,et al.  Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. , 2001, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[19]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of the denaturation of ubiquitin. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  G. Makhatadze,et al.  Engineering a thermostable protein via optimization of charge-charge interactions on the protein surface. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[21]  Vladimir Sklenar,et al.  Gradient-Tailored Water Suppression for 1H-15N HSQC Experiments Optimized to Retain Full Sensitivity , 1993 .

[22]  D N Woolfson,et al.  Dissecting the structure of a partially folded protein. Circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of peptides from ubiquitin. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  A. D. Robertson,et al.  Microsecond protein folding kinetics from native-state hydrogen exchange. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[24]  M. Proctor,et al.  Structural changes in the transition state of protein folding: alternative interpretations of curved chevron plots. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[25]  C. Bugg,et al.  Comparison of the three-dimensional structures of human, yeast, and oat ubiquitin. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  R. Pastor,et al.  Rotational Diffusion Anisotropy of Human Ubiquitin from 1 5 N NMR Relaxation Nico Tjandra ? , 2001 .

[27]  G. Makhatadze,et al.  Heat capacity changes upon burial of polar and nonpolar groups in proteins , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  B. Stockman,et al.  Heteronuclear three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy of a partially denatured protein: The A-state of human ubiquitin , 1993, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[29]  L. Kay,et al.  Backbone 1H and 15N resonance assignments of the N-terminal SH3 domain of drk in folded and unfolded states using enhanced-sensitivity pulsed field gradient NMR techniques , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[30]  Zhengshuang Shi,et al.  Contribution of hydrogen bonding to protein stability estimated from isotope effects. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[31]  G. A. Lazar,et al.  Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  Dudley H. Williams,et al.  Characterization of a partially denatured state of a protein by two-dimensional NMR: reduction of the hydrophobic interactions in ubiquitin. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[33]  R. Li,et al.  The hydrogen exchange core and protein folding , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[34]  G. Makhatadze,et al.  Anion binding to the ubiquitin molecule , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Natural abundance nitrogen-15 NMR by enhanced heteronuclear spectroscopy , 1980 .

[36]  R M Esnouf,et al.  An extensively modified version of MolScript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capabilities. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[37]  Core-directed protein design. II. Rescue of a multiply mutated and destabilized variant of ubiquitin. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[38]  G. Makhatadze,et al.  Thermal versus guanidine-induced unfolding of ubiquitin. An analysis in terms of the contributions from charge-charge interactions to protein stability. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[39]  L. Lally.  The CCP 4 Suite — Computer programs for protein crystallography , 1998 .

[40]  C. Bugg,et al.  Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  S. Khorasanizadeh,et al.  Evidence for a three-state model of protein folding from kinetic analysis of ubiquitin variants with altered core residues , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[42]  T. Pawson,et al.  Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[43]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[44]  T. Handel,et al.  Effect of hydrophobic core packing on sidechain dynamics , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[45]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[46]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Thermodynamic consequences of burial of polar and non-polar amino acid residues in the protein interior. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Yawen Bai,et al.  Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange , 1993, Biochemistry.

[48]  G. Lazar,et al.  Hydrophobic core packing and protein design. , 1998, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[49]  D N Woolfson,et al.  Core-directed protein design. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[50]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[51]  A. Fersht,et al.  Movement of the position of the transition state in protein folding. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[52]  A. Hvidt,et al.  Hydrogen exchange in proteins. , 1966, Advances in protein chemistry.

[53]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Observation of strange kinetics in protein folding. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.