Global feature-based attention to orientation.

Selective attention to motion direction can modulate the strength of direction-selective sensory responses regardless of their spatial locations. Although such spatially global modulation is thought to be a general property of feature-based attention, few studies have examined visual features other than motion. Here, we used an adaptation protocol combined with attentional instructions to assess whether attention to orientation, a prominent feature in early visual processing, also exhibit such spatially global modulation. We adapted observers to an orientation by cuing them to attend to the orientation in a compound grating that was presented at a peripheral location. We then assessed the size of the tilt aftereffect at three locations that were never stimulated by the adapter. Attending to orientation produced a tilt aftereffect in these locations, indicating that attention modulated orientation-selective mechanisms in remote locations from the adapter. Furthermore, there was no difference in the magnitude of the tilt aftereffect for test stimuli that were located at different distances and hemifields to the adapter. These results suggest that attention to orientation spreads uniformly across the visual field. Thus, spatially global modulation seems to be a general property of feature-based attention, and it provides a flexible mechanism to modulate feature salience across the visual field.

[1]  G. Boynton,et al.  Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  G R Mangun,et al.  Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  N. Weisstein,et al.  A phantom-motion aftereffect. , 1977, Science.

[5]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[6]  M. Sur,et al.  Adaptation-Induced Plasticity of Orientation Tuning in Adult Visual Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[7]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Contrast Adaptation and Representation in Human Early Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[10]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Taosheng Liu,et al.  Constant spread of feature-based attention across the visual field , 2011, Vision Research.

[14]  M. Carrasco Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[15]  Jenna G. Kelly,et al.  Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks , 2009, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Boynton Attention and visual perception , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[21]  P. Lennie,et al.  Contrast adaptation in striate cortex of macaque , 1989, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  H. Seung,et al.  Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  C. Clifford Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  A. Metha,et al.  Enhanced motion aftereffect for complex motions , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[27]  F. Hamker,et al.  Attention Alters Feature Space in Motion Processing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Desimone,et al.  Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex , 2010 .

[32]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  R. Snowden,et al.  Phantom motion aftereffects – evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow , 1997, Current Biology.

[34]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.