Biological stiffness control strategies for the Anatomically Correct Testbed (ACT) hand

With the goal of developing biologically inspired manipulation strategies for an anthropomorphic hand, we investigated how the human central nervous system utilizes the hands redundant neuromusculoskeletal biomechanics to transition between conditions. Using a experiment protocol where subjects were asked to transit between control states with equal end-effector force but different stiffness requirements, we observed that (1) some subjects used the same muscle synergy for both conditions by maintaining the same synergy throughout the transition, and (2) other subjects used two different muscle synergies to execute two conditions by transiting from one synergy to another rapidly. We hypothesize that humans typically try to use the same muscle synergy to execute two tasks when it is possible to optimize on the simplicity and speed over energy. This is a different control strategy from the way robots have been controlled in the past, and it provides a new direction in controlling an anthropomorphic robotic hand.

[1]  K. Leung.  Linear Algebra and Geometry , 1974 .

[2]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Fine Motions , 1977 .

[3]  John J. Craig,et al.  Hybrid position/force control of manipulators , 1981 .

[4]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[6]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control:An Approach to Manipulation,Parts I,II,III , 1985 .

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Stable execution of contact tasks using impedance control , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  F. Netter.  Atlas of Human Anatomy , 1967 .

[10]  Phillip J. McKerrow,et al.  Introduction to robotics , 1991 .

[11]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement , 1995 .

[12]  F. Zajac,et al.  Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Il Hong Suh,et al.  Motion/force decomposition of redundant manipulator and its application to hybrid impedance control , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[14]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Harvey Lipkin,et al.  Synthesis of Cartesian stiffness for robotic applications , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[16]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  F. Valero-Cuevas.  Predictive modulation of muscle coordination pattern magnitude scales fingertip force magnitude over the voluntary range. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Different mechanisms involved in adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Michael Vande Weghe,et al.  The ACT Hand: design of the skeletal structure , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[20]  M. Hinder,et al.  Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  A kinematic thumb model for the ACT hand , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..