Structural Complexity of Multiobjective NP Search Problems

An NP search problem is a multivalued function that maps instances to polynomially length-bounded solutions such that the validity of solutions is testable in polynomial time. NPMVg denotes the class of these functions. There are at least two computational tasks associated with an NP search problem: (i) Find out whether a solution exists. (ii) Compute an arbitrary solution. Further computational tasks arise in settings with multiple objectives, for example: (iii) Compute a solution that is minimal w.r.t. the first objective, while the second objective does not exceed some budget. Each such computational task defines a class of multivalued functions. We systematically investigate these classes and their relation to traditional complexity classes and classes of multivalued functions, like NP or max·P. For multiobjective problems, some classes of computational tasks turn out to be equivalent to the function class NPMVg, some to the class of decision problems NP, and some to a seemingly new class that includes both NPMVg and NP. Under the assumption that certain exponential time classes are different, we show that there are computational tasks of multiobjective problems (more precisely functions in NPMVg) that are Turing-inequivalent to any set.

[1]  Lane A. Hemaspaandra,et al.  Computing Solutions Uniquely Collapses the Polynomial Hierarchy , 1996, SIAM J. Comput..

[2]  Mihalis Yannakakis,et al.  The complexity of restricted spanning tree problems , 1982, JACM.

[3]  Heribert Vollmer,et al.  Complements of multivalued functions , 1996, Proceedings of Computational Complexity (Formerly Structure in Complexity Theory).

[4]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Relative Complexity of Checking and Evaluating , 1976, Inf. Process. Lett..

[5]  José L. Balcázar,et al.  Bi-immune sets for complexity classes , 2005, Mathematical systems theory.

[6]  Harald Hempel,et al.  The Operators min and max on the Polynomial Hierarchy , 2000, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci..

[7]  Alan L. Selman A survey of one-way functions in complexity theory , 2005, Mathematical systems theory.

[8]  Mitsunori Ogihara,et al.  Oracles that Compute Values , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[9]  Timothy J. Long,et al.  Quantitative Relativizations of Complexity Classes , 1984, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  José L. Balcázar,et al.  Self-reducibility structures and solutions of NP problemst , 1989 .

[11]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  Programs, Proofs, Processes , 2012, Theory of Computing Systems.

[12]  Diederich Hinrichsen,et al.  Mathematical Systems Theory I , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  The Relative Complexity of NP Search Problems , 1998, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[14]  Christian Glaßer,et al.  Approximability and Hardness in Multi-objective Optimization , 2010, CiE.

[15]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  Languages that are easier than their proofs , 1991, [1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science.

[16]  Alan J. Demers,et al.  Some Comments on Functional Self-Reducibility and the NP Hierarchy , 1976 .

[17]  Alan L. Selman,et al.  A Taxonomy of Complexity Classes of Functions , 1994, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[18]  Alan L. Selman Much ado about functions , 1996, Proceedings of Computational Complexity (Formerly Structure in Complexity Theory).

[19]  Mark W. Krentel The Complexity of Optimization Problems , 1988, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..