Studies of Author Cocitation Analysis: A Bibliometric Approach for Domain Analysis

Author Cocitation Analysis (ACA) can be defined as the analysis of a group of actors, writers or researchers structurally organized in a (social and cognitive) network of a particular scientific community. The greater the number of researchers selected, the greater the amplitude and the domain boundary under consideration; the more restricted the number of researchers chosen as representative and appropriate, the less extensive the domain. From the perspective of the first axis of Tennis (2003), the selection of authors involves setting parameters on the extent of the domain, i.e., its total scope and amplitude. Thus, from the point of view of Tennis’s (2003) approach to Domain Analysis, the selection of authors for Author Cocitation Analysis is associated with the designations and boundaries of the domain, as well as to their goals (Tennis, 2003). Still, the selection of authors through the most cited authors in the literature, reflects the core elements of a domain and constitute the most specific foundation of a domain, aligning to the Degrees of Specialization characterized by Tennis (2003). It is concluded that the Author Cocitation Analysis (ACA) is a relevant procedure to the analysis of the underlying structure of a scientific knowledge domain, which meets the theories and concepts of Domain Analysis researchers, in that it allows characterizing the science, identifying, analyzing and assessing the conditions under which scientific knowledge is constructed and socialized.

[1]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[2]  Markus Gmür,et al.  Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation , 2004, Scientometrics.

[3]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations , 1985, Scientometrics.

[5]  Richard P. Smiraglia.  Domain Coherence Within Knowledge Organization: People, Interacting Theoretically, Across Geopolitical and Cultural Boundaries , 2013 .

[6]  Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio,et al.  Visibilidade dos pesquisadores no periódico Scientometrics a partir da perspectiva brasileira: um estudo de cocitação , 2018 .

[7]  Howard D. White,et al.  Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Pollyana Custódio.  Dissertações e teses da pós-graduação em educação na Unesp-Campus de Marília: um estudo das citações e cocitações (2004 a 2009) , 2012 .

[9]  Sandra Miguel,et al.  A new approach to institutional domain analysis: Multilevel research fronts structure , 2007, Scientometrics.

[10]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Joseph T. Tennis.  Two Axes of Domains for Domain Analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Henry G. Small,et al.  On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation , 2004, Scientometrics.

[13]  Yoshiko Okubo,et al.  Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems : methods and examples , 1997 .

[14]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Analysis in indexing: document and domain centered approaches , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  José Augusto Chaves Guimarães,et al.  ANÁLISE BIBLIOMÉTRICA DO PERIÓDICO BRASILEIRO CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO DURANTE O PERÍODO 2000-2004 , 2007 .

[16]  H. Albrechtsen,et al.  Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  E. Kerr,et al.  Ketib : um processo de representação de informações para textos complexos , 2003 .

[18]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Domain analysis in information science Eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative , 2002 .

[19]  W. Glänzel.  BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators , 2003 .

[20]  Howard D. White.  Cocited author retrieval , 1986 .

[21]  Juan Llorens Morillo,et al.  Automatic generation of domain representations using thesaurus structures , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Yoshiko Okubo,et al.  Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems , 1997 .

[23]  Richard P. Smiraglia.  ISKO 11’s Diverse Bookshelf: An Editorial , 2011 .

[24]  Torkild Thellefsen,et al.  Pragmatic Semiotics and Knowledge Organization , 2004 .

[25]  Michel Callon,et al.  Cienciometría: la medición de la actividad científica: de la bibliometría a la vigilancia tecnológica , 1995 .

[26]  F. Narin,et al.  Bibliometrics/Theory, Practice and Problems , 1994 .

[27]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio,et al.  Produção e comunicação da informação em CT&I – GT7 da Ancib: análise bibliométrica no período 2003/2009 | Production and communication of information in ST&I– GT7 of Ancib: bibliometric analysis between the years of 2003 and 2009 , 2011 .