How reinforcer type affects choice in economic games

Behavioral economists stress that experiments on judgment and decision-making using economic games should be played with real money if the results are to have generality. Behavior analysts have sometimes disputed this contention and have reported results in which hypothetical rewards and real money have produced comparable outcomes. We review studies that have compared hypothetical and real money and discuss the results of two relevant experiments. In the first, using the Sharing Game developed in our laboratory, subjects' choices differed markedly depending on whether the rewards were real or hypothetical. In the second, using the Ultimatum and Dictator Games, we again found sharp differences between real and hypothetical rewards. However, this study also showed that time off from a tedious task could serve as a reinforcer every bit as potent as money. In addition to their empirical and theoretical contributions, these studies make the methodological point that meaningful studies may be conducted with economic games without spending money: time off from a tedious task can serve as a powerful reward.

[1]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[2]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error , 1996, Nature.

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[4]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[6]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[7]  H. Rachlin.  Altruism and selfishness , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  E. Fantino,et al.  The Sharing Game: Fairness in resource allocation as a function of incentive, gender, and recipient types , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[9]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors , 1993, INTERCHI Adjunct Proceedings.

[10]  R. J. Auge.  Context, observing behavior, and conditioned reinforcement. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E. Fantino,et al.  Instructions and reinforcement in the observing behavior of adults and children , 1989 .

[12]  Shin Tsunematsu.  Effort- and time-cost effects on demand curves for food by pigeons under short session closed economies , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  E Fantino,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Human Obser Ving: Maintained by Nega Tive Informative Stimuli Only If Correlated with Improvement in Response Efficiency , 2022 .

[16]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Observing reward-informative and -uninformative stimuli by normal children of different ages ☆ , 1983 .

[17]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  An Experientially Derived Base-Rate Error in Humans , 1995 .

[18]  J. Dinsmoor.  Observing and conditioned reinforcement , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  What does and does not alleviate base-rate neglect under direct experience , 1999 .

[20]  Warren K Bickel,et al.  Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  J. Dinsmoor,et al.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Evidential impact of base rates , 1981 .

[24]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[25]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[26]  S. Lea,et al.  Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  E Fantino,et al.  Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[28]  H. Weiner.  An operant analysis of human altruistic responding. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  E. Fantino.  Behavior-analytic approaches to decision making , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[31]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[33]  E. Fantino,et al.  Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness. , 2003, The American journal of psychology.