The transition from CRT to LCD monitors: Effects on monitor placement and possible consequences in viewing distance and body postures

Abstract This study investigates the changes in monitor placement, caused by the transition from cathode ray tube (CRT) to liquid crystal displays (LCDs), and discusses possible effects on the resulting viewing distance and the compensating workers’ postures. The comparison between 148 workplaces equipped with CRT and 115 equipped with LCD monitors, revealed that the LCD monitors are positioned closer to the rear side of desks, augmenting the mean distance of the screen from the front edge of the desk by nearly 10 cm. The above finding suggests that the mean effective viewing distance may have also increased by the same amount. Considering data on monitors’ types, specifications and operating systems’ default character size, the study also suggests that in LCD monitors, the augmented viewing distance often exceeds the recommended angular height for comfortable reading while in a comfortable sitting posture. With the aid of a cybernetic model and the above empirical findings, we attempt to explain how the increase of the available effective space in front of the worker offered by LCD monitors may result in the adoption of adverse postures to improve the screen's legibility. Relevance to industry LCD monitors are relatively new, but rapidly spreading in the computerized offices, due to their advantages compared to the CRT monitors. Studying the possible side effects of this transition in a pragmatic manner based on data from actual work settings, may not only help to better understand the persisting adverse postures in modern LCD workplaces, but may also direct the way for practical improvements.

[1]  Marino Menozzi,et al.  CRT versus LCD: Effects of refresh rate, display technology and background luminance in visual performance. , 2001 .

[2]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Effects of reflection and polarity on LCD viewing distance , 2000 .

[3]  Jan Dul,et al.  A review of ISO and CEN standards on ergonomics , 1996 .

[4]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[5]  W Jaschinski-Kruza,et al.  Visual strain during VDU work: the effect of viewing distance and dark focus. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[6]  Wolfgang Jaschtnski-Kruza On the preferred viewing distances to screen and document at VDU workplaces , 1990 .

[7]  R F Fisher,et al.  The force of contraction of the human ciliary muscle during accommodation , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Rani Lueder,et al.  Hard facts about soft machines : the ergonomics of seating , 1994 .

[9]  Knut Inge Fostervold,et al.  VDU work with downward gaze : The emperor's new clothes or scientifically sound? , 2003 .

[10]  E N Corlett,et al.  Background to sitting at work: research-based requirements for the design of work seats , 2006, Ergonomics.

[11]  Chin-Chiuan Lin,et al.  Comparison of TFT-LCD and CRT on visual recognition and subjective preference , 2004 .

[12]  L. Claes,et al.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. , 1999, Spine.

[13]  Steven L. Sauter,et al.  Promoting health and productivity in the computerized office , 1991 .

[14]  Etienne Grandjean,et al.  Ergonomics in computerized offices , 1986 .

[15]  T Stewart,et al.  Ergonomics user interface standards: are they more trouble than they are worth? , 2000, Ergonomics.

[16]  G. Elfström,et al.  Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. A study of common movements, maneuvers and exercises. , 1970, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[17]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[18]  W Jaschinski-Kruza,et al.  Eyestrain in VDU Users: Viewing Distance and the Resting Position of Ocular Muscles , 1991, Human factors.

[19]  Ahmet E. Çakir International HCI-Standards for the Workplace and the Work Environment , 2000 .

[20]  A Aarås,et al.  Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[21]  Arne Aarås,et al.  Work with visual display units: Long-term health effects of high and downward line-of-sight in ordinary office environments , 2006 .

[22]  S. L. Wright,et al.  Resolution and legibility: A comparison of TFT‐LCDs and CRTs , 1999 .

[23]  R. Burgess-Limerick,et al.  The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  Sanford W. Horstman,et al.  Self reported musculoskeletal sumptoms among office video display terminal operators , 1990 .

[25]  Gunnar Horgen,et al.  Work With the Visual Display Unit: Health Consequences , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  L. Straker,et al.  An evaluation of visual display unit placement by electromyography, posture, discomfort and preference , 2000 .

[27]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.