An invasive‐native mammalian species replacement process captured by camera trap survey random encounter models

Camera traps are used to estimate densities or abundances using capture-recapture and, more recently, random encounter models (REMs). We deploy REMs to describe an invasive-native species replacement process, and to demonstrate their wider application beyond abundance estimation. The Irish hare Lepus timidus hibernicus is a high priority endemic of conservation concern. It is threatened by an expanding population of nonnative, European hares L. europaeus, an invasive species of global importance. Camera traps were deployed in thirteen 1 km squares, wherein the ratio of invader to native densities were corroborated by night-driven line transect distance sampling throughout the study area of 1652 km2. Spatial patterns of invasive and native densities between the invader's core and peripheral ranges, and native allopatry, were comparable between methods. Native densities in the peripheral range were comparable to those in native allopatry using REM, or marginally depressed using Distance Sampling. Numbers of the invader were substantially higher than the native in the core range, irrespective of method, with a 5:1 invader-to-native ratio indicating species replacement. We also describe a post hoc optimization protocol for REM which will inform subsequent (re-)surveys, allowing survey effort (camera hours) to be reduced by up to 57% without compromising the width of confidence intervals associated with density estimates. This approach will form the basis of a more cost-effective means of surveillance and monitoring for both the endemic and invasive species. The European hare undoubtedly represents a significant threat to the endemic Irish hare.

[1]  Frank P. Howe,et al.  A SEVEN-YEAR COMPARISON OF RELATIVE-ABUNDANCE AND DISTANCE-SAMPLING METHODS , 2003 .

[2]  Å. Pehrson,et al.  The recent expansion of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Sweden with possible implications to the mountain hare (L. timidus) , 2007, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[3]  J. Belant,et al.  Occurrence of invasive mammals in southern Nahuel Huapi National Park , 2013 .

[4]  Heiko G. Rödel,et al.  The influence of daylight regime on diurnal locomotor activity patterns of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) during summer , 2012 .

[5]  L. Silveira,et al.  Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation , 2003 .

[6]  Regina Bispo,et al.  Accounting for animal density gradients using independent information in distance sampling surveys , 2013, Stat. Methods Appl..

[7]  J. Belant,et al.  Anthropogenic and environmental effects on invasive mammal distribution in northern Patagonia, Argentina , 2015 .

[8]  N. Reid European hare (Lepus europaeus) invasion ecology: implication for the conservation of the endemic Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus) , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[9]  Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds,et al.  The adaptive significance of coloration in lagomorphs , 2003 .

[10]  John G. White,et al.  Camera Trapping: A Contemporary Approach to Monitoring Invasive Rodents in High Conservation Priority Ecosystems , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  I. Atkinson Introductions of wildlife as a cause of species extinctions , 1996, Wildlife Biology.

[12]  M. Kelly,et al.  Estimating Puma Densities from Camera Trapping across Three Study Sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize , 2008 .

[13]  James D. Williams,et al.  Extinctions of North American Fishes During the past Century , 1989 .

[14]  M. Yasuda Monitoring diversity and abundance of mammals with camera traps: a case study on Mount Tsukuba, central Japan , 2004 .

[15]  F. Rovero,et al.  Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods , 2014 .

[16]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Small-mammal density estimation: A field comparison of grid-based vs. web-based density estimators , 2003 .

[17]  S. Humphrey,et al.  Comparison of 2 Methods to Estimate Density of an Endangered Lagomorph , 1997 .

[18]  E. Mendoza,et al.  Density, Abundance and Activity Patterns of the Endangered Tapirus Bairdii in One of its Last Strongholds in Southern Mexico , 2014 .

[19]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[20]  Piran C. L. White,et al.  Selection of line‐transect methods for estimating the density of group‐living animals: lessons from the primates , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[21]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Applying a random encounter model to estimate lion density from camera traps in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania , 2015, The Journal of wildlife management.

[22]  S. Harris,et al.  An integrated monitoring programme for terrestrial mammals in Britain , 2004 .

[23]  Shefali V. Mehta,et al.  Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management , 2007 .

[24]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Point Transect Sampling Along Linear Features , 2010, Biometrics.

[25]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Monitoring an Endangered savannah ungulate, Grevy's zebra Equus grevyi: choosing a method for estimating population densities , 2013, Oryx.

[26]  K. Hackländer,et al.  The influence of cereal harvest on the home-range use of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) , 2014 .

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 1995 .

[28]  R. Kays,et al.  Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach , 2011 .

[29]  H. Hager,et al.  Limits and effects of invasion by the nonindigenous wetland plant Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife): a seed bank analysis , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[30]  Estimation of population density of European pine marten in central Italy using camera trapping , 2012, Acta Theriologica.

[31]  Range expansion and comparative habitat use of insular, congeneric lagomorphs: invasive European hares Lepus europaeus and endemic Irish hares Lepus timidus hibernicus , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[32]  David L. Smith,et al.  The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals , 2001, Animal Conservation.

[33]  M. Usher Invasibility and wildlife conservation: invasive species on nature reserves , 1986 .

[34]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Advanced Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 2004 .

[35]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[36]  Francesco Rovero,et al.  Camera trapping photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates , 2009 .

[37]  N. Reid,et al.  IS NATURALISATION OF THE BROWN HARE IN IRELAND A THREAT TO THE ENDEMIC IRISH HARE? , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[38]  F. Dessì-Fulgheri,et al.  Winter locomotor activity patterns of European hares (Lepus europaeus) , 2013 .

[39]  H. Tegelström,et al.  Species assignment and hybrid identification among Scandinavian hares Lepus europaeus and L. timidus , 2006 .

[40]  N. Reid,et al.  Verification of hybridisation between introduced European and native Irish hares , 2009 .

[41]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[42]  P. Stahl,et al.  Applying distance‐sampling methods to spotlight counts of red foxes , 2003 .

[43]  Samuel T. Turvey,et al.  Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition , 2008 .

[44]  Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos,et al.  Is it possible to individually identify mammals with no natural markings using camera-traps?A controlled case-study with lowland tapirs , 2010 .

[45]  T. Fritts,et al.  THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam1 , 1998 .

[46]  K. Ullas Karanth,et al.  Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models , 1995 .

[47]  Andrew J. Noss,et al.  Camera-trap studies of maned wolf density in the Cerrado and the Pantanal of Brazil , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[48]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations , 2011, 1112.3250.

[50]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[51]  Graham W. Smith,et al.  A Spotlight, Line-Transect method for Surveying Jack Rabbits , 1985 .

[52]  Len Thomas,et al.  Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size , 2009, The Journal of applied ecology.

[53]  T. Cutler Using remote photography in wildlife ecology : a review , 1999 .

[54]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  Bias in estimating animal travel distance: the effect of sampling frequency , 2012 .

[55]  N. Reid,et al.  Homogeneous habitat can meet the discrete and varied resource requirements of hares but may set an ecological trap , 2010 .

[56]  Marc Kéry,et al.  ESTIMATION OF OCELOT DENSITY IN THE PANTANAL USING CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS OF CAMERA-TRAPPING DATA , 2003 .

[57]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  Community disassembly by an invasive species , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  D. MacKenzie WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? , 2005 .