Cycling Induced by Electrical Stimulation Improves Motor Recovery in Postacute Hemiparetic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Purpose— This study assessed whether cycling induced by functional electrical stimulation (FES) was more effective than passive cycling with placebo stimulation in promoting motor recovery and walking ability in postacute hemiparetic patients. Methods— In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 35 patients were included and randomized to receive FES-induced cycling training or placebo FES cycling. The 4-week treatment consisted of 20 sessions lasting 25 minutes each. Primary outcome measures included the leg subscale of the Motricity Index and gait speed during a 50-meter walking test. Secondary outcomes were the Trunk Control Test, the Upright Motor Control Test, the mean work produced by the paretic leg, and the unbalance in mechanical work between paretic and nonparetic legs during voluntary pedaling. Participants were evaluated before training, after training, and at 3- to 5-month follow-up visits. Results— No significant differences were found between groups at baseline. Repeated-measures ANOVA (P<0.05) revealed significant increases in Motricity Index, Trunk Control Test, Upright Motor Control Test, gait speed, and mean work of the paretic leg after training and at follow-up assessments for FES-treated patients. No outcome measures demonstrated significant improvements after training in the placebo group. Both groups showed no significant differences between assessments after training and at follow-up. A main effect favoring FES-treated patients was demonstrated by repeated-measures ANCOVA for Motricity Index (P<0.001), Trunk Control Test (P=0.001), Upright Motor Control Test (P=0.005), and pedaling unbalance (P=0.038). Conclusions— The study demonstrated that 20 sessions of FES cycling training significantly improved lower extremity motor functions and accelerated the recovery of overground locomotion in postacute hemiparetic patients. Improvements were maintained at follow-up.

[1]  Chao Qian,et al.  Population , 1940, State Rankings 2020: A Statistical View of America.

[2]  R. Beaglehole,et al.  Recovery of motor function after stroke. , 1988, Stroke.

[3]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[5]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[6]  L. Tesio,et al.  Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. , 1997, Stroke.

[7]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to activity-dependent plasticity in primate somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Criterion validity of lower extremity Motricity Index scores , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  J. Carey,et al.  Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Abdulmajeed Al Abdukareem Randomized, placebo-controlled trial , 2004, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[12]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF Core Sets for stroke. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  T. Yan,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Motor Recovery of the Lower Extremity and Walking Ability of Subjects With First Acute Stroke: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2005, Stroke.

[14]  Andrew J Vickers,et al.  Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[15]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke , 2006 .

[16]  Shawn M Robbins,et al.  The therapeutic effect of functional and transcutaneous electric stimulation on improving gait speed in stroke patients: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  A. de Haan,et al.  Effects of electric stimulation-assisted cycling training in people with chronic stroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  J Szecsi,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation assisted cycling of patients with subacute stroke: kinetic and kinematic analysis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: a critical review of intervention approaches. , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Cycling induced by functional electrical stimulation improves the muscular strength and the motor control of individuals with post-acute stroke. Europa Medicophysica-SIMFER 2007 Award Winner. , 2008, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  Jayme Knutson,et al.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Motor Restoration in Hemiplegia , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[22]  M. Popovic,et al.  Electrical stimulation as a means for achieving recovery of function in stroke patients. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[23]  Susan T. Francis,et al.  fMRI analysis of active, passive and electrically stimulated ankle dorsiflexion , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Steven Y Cen,et al.  Meaningful Gait Speed Improvement During the First 60 Days Poststroke: Minimal Clinically Important Difference , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[25]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Design of a symmetry controller for cycling induced by electrical stimulation: preliminary results on post-acute stroke patients. , 2010, Artificial organs.

[26]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Metrological characterization of a cycle-ergometer to optimize the cycling induced by functional electrical stimulation on patients with stroke. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  Gad Alon,et al.  Intensive training of subjects with chronic hemiparesis on a motorized cycle combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES): a feasibility and safety study. , 2011, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.