The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people

This paper begins by presenting the theory of boundary critique, which is a key aspect of current work in the area of critical systems thinking. The theory suggests that researchers should remain aware of the need to access a diverse variety of stakeholder views in defining problems, and to ‘sweep in’ relevant information. It also offers an understanding of how conflicts between stakeholders can become stabilised, leading to the marginalisation of some stakeholder groups and the issues that concern them. This indicates the importance of taking processes of marginalisation into account during interventions, promoting and revaluing the contributions that can be made by marginal groups. The theory of boundary critique is illustrated through a case study in which the researchers supported the multi-agency development of housing services for older people. Reflection upon this case study reveals that the principle means by which the theory of boundary critique informs intervention is through the design of methods. Methods can be developed specifically to explore the boundaries of problems. Also, the design of methods to address these problems can take account of the need to preserve the contributions of marginalised groups.

[1]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  What Is This Thing Called CST , 1996 .

[2]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Can We Secure Future-Responsive Management Through Systems Thinking and Design? , 1994 .

[3]  John Holt,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings , 1992 .

[4]  W. Ulrich.  C. West Churchman-75 years , 1988 .

[5]  Leroy White,et al.  The Death of the Expert , 1994 .

[6]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  Developing the methodology of TSI: From the oblique use of methods to creative design , 1997 .

[7]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking , 1992 .

[8]  C. Churchman.  The systems approach and its enemies , 1979 .

[9]  John Mingers,et al.  Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy , 1983 .

[10]  G. Kreweras.  Creating the corporate future: Russell L. ACKOFF Wiley, New York, 1981, xi + 297 pages, £10.85 , 1982 .

[11]  R. Mason.  Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[12]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[13]  J. Habermas.  The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system - A critique of functionalist reason , 1990 .

[14]  J. R. Beaumont.  Diagnosing the System for Organizations , 1985 .

[15]  M. Douglas,et al.  Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. , 1967 .

[16]  E. Leach.  Culture and communication: the logic by which symbols are connected , 1977 .

[17]  Michael Elstob,et al.  Critical Heuristics of Social Planning , 1998 .

[18]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  Creating Employment Opportunities for People with Mental Health Problems: A Feasibility Study for New Initiatives , 1995 .

[19]  M. Jackson.  The origins and nature of critical systems thinking , 1991 .

[20]  G. Midgley.  Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond , 1997 .

[21]  R. Flood,et al.  Critical systems heuristics: Application of an emancipatory approach for police strategy toward the carrying of offensive weapons , 1991 .

[22]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[23]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Churchman's “process of unfolding”—Its significance for policy analysis and evaluation , 1988 .

[24]  C. Churchman.  Operations Research as a Profession , 1970 .

[25]  E. Jantsch.  The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[26]  J. Habermas.  Communication and the Evolution of Society , 1979 .

[27]  C. Churchman,et al.  Challenge to Reason , 1968 .