Prognostic Value of Mucinous Histology Depends on Microsatellite Instability Status in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer Treated with Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThe close association between mucinous histology and microsatellite instability (MSI) may have hindered the evaluation of prognostic significance of mucinous histology. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate whether mucinous histology was associated with a worse prognosis, independent of MSI status, compared to nonmucinous histology in patients with stage III colon cancer.MethodsThis study enrolled 394 consecutive patients with stage III colorectal cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX after curative resection (R0). Clinicopathological information was retrospectively reviewed. Tumors were analyzed for MSI by polymerase chain reaction to determine MSI status. Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used.ResultsThe estimated rate of 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMA 79.2 %) was significantly greater than that in patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) and adenocarcinoma with mucinous component (MC) (56.9 %; log-rank, P = 0.002). In univariate analysis, histology (NMA vs. MA/MC), American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC), and lymphovascular invasion (present vs. absent) were significantly associated with DFS. In multivariate analysis, mucinous histology (MA/MC) was associated with decreased DFS in all patients (hazard ratio 1.82, 95 % confidence interval 1.03–3.23, P = 0.0403). In patients with MA/MC, no difference in DFS was observed between MSI and microsatellite stability (log-rank, P = 0.732).ConclusionsMucinous histology is an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS in patients with stage III colon cancer after adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy.

[1]  J. Cubiella,et al.  5-Fluorouracil adjuvant chemotherapy does not increase survival in patients with CpG island methylator phenotype colorectal cancer. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[2]  M E Hammond,et al.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  E. Seim,et al.  Influence of mucinous components on survival in colorectal adenocarcinomas: a multivariate analysis. , 1988, Journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  C. Ko,et al.  A 10-Year Outcomes Evaluation of Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum , 2005, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[5]  J. Herman,et al.  Low-level microsatellite instability in most colorectal carcinomas. , 2002, Cancer research.

[6]  Chen Han-Shiang Curative Resection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Multivariate Analysis of 5-Year Follow-up , 1999, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  Y. Kodera,et al.  Survival After Curative Resection for Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Colorectum , 2003, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  R. Costi,et al.  Two Subtypes of Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Colorectum: Clinicopathological and Genetic Features , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  S. Kakar,et al.  Mucinous carcinomas of the colorectum have distinct molecular genetic characteristics. , 2005, International journal of oncology.

[10]  D. Parkin,et al.  Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  Shung-Haur Yang,et al.  Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial to high risk stage II colon cancer? Analysis in a single institute , 2009, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[12]  J. Jass Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features , 2007, Histopathology.

[13]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  S Srivastava,et al.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. , 1998, Cancer research.

[15]  V. Catalano,et al.  Mucinous histology predicts for poor response rate and overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer and treated with first-line oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-based chemotherapy , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  R. Houlston,et al.  Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Clive R. Taylor,et al.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer , 2009 .

[18]  M. Chew,et al.  Improved survival in an Asian cohort of young colorectal cancer patients: an analysis of 523 patients from a single institution , 2009, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[19]  M. Pollheimer,et al.  Mucinous differentiation in colorectal cancer – indicator of poor prognosis? , 2012, Histopathology.

[20]  Stanley R. Hamilton,et al.  Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system , 2000 .

[21]  V. Catalano,et al.  Prognosis of mucinous histology for patients with radically resected stage II and III colon cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  C. Ratto,et al.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer , 1998, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[23]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[24]  P. Catalano,et al.  Association between DNA Methylation and Shortened Survival in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with 5-Fluorouracil–Based Chemotherapy , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  J. Guillem,et al.  Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum , 1999 .

[26]  Yan Xing,et al.  Clinicopathology and Outcomes for Mucinous and Signet Ring Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  C. Compton,et al.  Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q: prospective evaluation of biomarkers for stages II and III colon cancer--a study of CALGB 9581 and 89803. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  S. Kawauchi,et al.  Two subtypes of mucinous colorectal carcinoma characterized by laser scanning cytometry and comparative genomic hybridization. , 2004, International journal of oncology.

[29]  A. Norman,et al.  Mucinous histology predicts for reduced fluorouracil responsiveness and survival in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  F. Consorti,et al.  Prognostic significance of mucinous carcinoma of colon and rectum: A prospective case‐control study , 2000, Journal of surgical oncology.

[31]  P. Demetter,et al.  Mucinous subtype as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[32]  田中 宏史 BRAF mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability occur more frequently and concordantly in mucinous than non-mucinous colorectal cancer , 2007 .

[33]  M. Loda,et al.  Distinct molecular features of colorectal carcinoma with signet ring cell component and colorectal carcinoma with mucinous component , 2006, Modern Pathology.