Guardianship and crime: an international comparative study of guardianship in action

An observational tool was developed to measure guardianship potential and guardianship in action in residential areas in The Hague, the Netherlands by Reynald (Crime Prevention and Community Safety 11(1):1–20, 2009; Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47(3):358–390, 2010). Guardianship potential was measured using the defensible space-based measures from the Block Environment Inventory (BEI), while Guardianship in Action (GIA) was observed by recording whether or not guardians (1) were visibly available, (2) were monitoring, and (3) intervened when necessary. This article reports on an international comparison of GIA in The Hague and in an American city. A comparative understanding will help advance knowledge on the measurement of active guardianship and related defensible space dimensions and identify socio-cultural differences in the application and meaning of the guardianship concept. Key results include that the observable dimensions of guardianship in action were reliable and valid, but some differences existed between the two sites including significant differences related to the social interaction measure. Similarities and differences across the two sites are examined, and implications for theory and research are explored.

[1]  Danielle M. Reynald,et al.  Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement , 2009 .

[2]  K. Wittebrood,et al.  Burglary Victimization in England and Wales, the United States and the Netherlands: A Cross-National Comparative Test of Routine Activities and Lifestyle Theories , 2004 .

[3]  P. Brantingham,et al.  Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment , 1993 .

[4]  A. Booth THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT AS A CRIME DETERRENT , 1981 .

[5]  Leanne Monchuk,et al.  It Looks Good, but What is it Like to Live There? Exploring the Impact of Innovative Housing Design on Crime , 2011 .

[6]  David Hillier,et al.  Crime and the design of residential property – exploring the theoretical background ‐ Part 1 , 2001 .

[7]  Paul Cozens,et al.  Crime prevention through environmental design , 2008 .

[8]  Danielle M. Reynald,et al.  Guardians on Guardianship: Factors Affecting the Willingness to Supervise, the Ability to Detect Potential Offenders, and the Willingness to Intervene , 2010 .

[9]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Reconceptualizing public area surveillance and crime prevention: Security guards, place managers and defensible space , 2010 .

[10]  Graham Farrell,et al.  Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease , 2007 .

[11]  Richard R. Bennett Routine Activities: A Cross-National Assessment of a Criminological Perspective , 1991 .

[12]  Brandon C. Welsh,et al.  Guardianship for crime prevention: a critical review of the literature , 2011 .

[13]  John E. Eck,et al.  Crime and place , 1995 .

[14]  Rachel Armitage,et al.  Sustainability Versus Safety: Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime , 2007 .

[15]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[16]  M. Felson,et al.  Crime and Everyday Life , 1998 .

[17]  O. Newman,et al.  Defensible Space; Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. , 1973 .

[18]  Marcus Felson,et al.  THOSE WHO DISCOURAGE CRIME , 2006 .

[19]  C. Ray Jeffery Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design , 1971 .

[20]  David Hillier,et al.  Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): a review and modern bibliography , 2005 .

[21]  Stephen D. Gottfredson,et al.  Block Crime and Fear: Defensible Space, Local Social Ties, and Territorial Functioning , 1984 .

[22]  D. Reynald Translating CPTED into Crime Preventive Action: A Critical Examination of CPTED as a Tool for Active Guardianship , 2011 .

[23]  D. Reynald Factors Associated with the Guardianship of Places: Assessing the Relative Importance of the Spatio-Physical and Sociodemographic Contexts in Generating Opportunities for Capable Guardianship , 2011 .

[24]  R. Mawby,et al.  Defensible Space: A Theoretical and Empirical Appraisal , 1977 .

[25]  Paul Ekblom,et al.  Deconstructing CPTED… and Reconstructing it for Practice, Knowledge Management and Research , 2011 .