Strengthening interaction from direct to virtual basis: Insights from ethical and professional empowerment

The shift paradigm of interaction way from live basis to virtual one has been widely emerged around the world in the last decade. However, the challenging issues like immoral behaviour such as cyberbullying cannot be escaped across borderless space. The need to exposure the extent of empowerment ethics referring to personalised learning and internet plus should be taken into account in the way to solve in the wise basis. This paper attempts to examine the moral engagement in underlying the interaction basis in terms of human communities including the on commitment caring, friendship and trust. Literature review from reviewed journals and books was conducted in the view of keyword. The finding reveals strengthening interaction from the direct basis to digital one refers to possess engagement between professional and ethical engagement. This study is expected to contribute in providing innovative approach on moral based digital interaction with enhancing capacities and abilities to improve the learning capacity engaged in operating the technology tools appropriately and wisely.

[1]  C. Baldry.  Theories of The Information Society , 1988 .

[2]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  From live interaction to virtual interaction: Addressing moral engagement in the digital era , 2017 .

[3]  Baiyun Chen,et al.  Investigating Instructional Strategies for Using Social Media in Formal and Informal Learning. , 2012 .

[4]  Ruimin Shen,et al.  Microblogging for Language Learning: Using Twitter to Train Communicative and Cultural Competence , 2009, ICWL.

[5]  David Rowe,et al.  Sport Beyond Television: The Internet, Digital Media and the Rise of Networked Media Sport , 2012 .

[6]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. , 2010 .

[7]  Rodney P. Gallagher,et al.  Implementations of technology enhanced personalized learning: Exploration of success criteria, concerns, and characteristics , 2014 .

[8]  Janet Rountree,et al.  Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion , 2003, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[9]  Emma Bartle.  Personalised learning: an overview , 2015 .

[10]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Developing the Commitment to Virtual Community: The Balanced Effects of Cognition and Affect , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[12]  Philippe Goujon,et al.  Toward a normative ethics for technology development , 2011, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[13]  Muhammad Anshari,et al.  Online Learning: trends, issues and challenges in the Big Data Era , 2016 .

[14]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  Traditional Wisdom on Sustainable Learning , 2017 .

[15]  Joseph E. Zins,et al.  Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[16]  Quentin Jones,et al.  Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Ahmad Rafiq Bin Yaacob,et al.  Exploring innovative learning environment (ILE): Big data era , 2017 .

[18]  Sam Epstein,et al.  The first book of teaching machines , 1961 .

[19]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  Innovative E-Therapy Service in Higher Education: Mobile Application Design , 2017, Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol..

[20]  Sangmi Chai,et al.  A socio-technical approach to knowledge contribution behavior: An empirical investigation of social networking sites users , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Sean Zwagerman.  The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, Panopticism, and the Rhetoric of Academic , 2008, College Composition & Communication.

[22]  Kamarul Azmi Jasmi,et al.  Empowering learning culture as student identity construction in higher education , 2017 .

[23]  Hans Schaffers,et al.  Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation , 2011, Future Internet Assembly.

[24]  Yabit Alas,et al.  Nurturing Compassion-Based Empathy: Innovative Approach in Higher Education , 2018 .

[25]  A. Dennis.  Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology , 2011 .

[26]  E. Spence.  Information, knowledge and wisdom: groundwork for the normative evaluation of digital information and its relation to the good life , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[27]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  Exploring Adaptive Teaching Competencies in Big Data Era , 2017, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[28]  Yabit Alas,et al.  Empowering Civic Responsibility: Insights From Service Learning , 2018 .

[29]  Runcan Patricia Luciana.  One minute more: Adolescent addiction for virtual world , 2010 .

[30]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  R. Bales,et al.  Family, socialization and interaction process , 1956 .

[32]  Kwok-Wing Lai,et al.  Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: the role of the computer coordinator , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  Ivana Greguric,et al.  Ethical issues of human enhancement technologies: Cyborg technology as the extension of human biology , 2014, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[34]  Michael J. Reese,et al.  Assessing the Future: E-Portfolio Trends, Uses, and Options in Higher Education , 2009 .

[35]  Robin Mackenzie,et al.  Challenges of ethical and legal responsibilities when technologies’ uses and users change: social networking sites, decision-making capacity and dementia , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[36]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference? , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[37]  Miftachul Huda,et al.  Empowering Children with Adaptive Technology Skills: Careful Engagement in the Digital Information Age , 2017 .