Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment

This paper reports the results of a randomized experimental evaluation of an innovative drug enforcement strategy developed as part of the Drug Market Analysis Program. Using computer mapping techniques, we identified 56 “hot spots” of drug activity that were randomized in statistical blocks to experimental and control conditions. The experimental strategy followed a stepwise approach that sought to engage business owners and citizens in crime control efforts, to apply pressure to reduce drug and drug-related activity through police crackdowns, and to initiate a maintenance program with the assistance of the patrol division of the department. In line with tactics employed by street-level narcotics units in many other American cities, the control strategy involved unsystematic arrest-oriented narcotics enforcement based on ad hoc target selection. Comparing seven-month pre- and post-intervention periods, we find consistent and strong effects of the experimental strategy on disorder-related emergency calls ...

[1]  George L. Kelling,et al.  The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment : a summary report , 1974 .

[2]  Thomas A. Reppetto Crime Prevention and the Displacement Phenomenon , 1976 .

[3]  H. Goldstein Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach , 1979 .

[4]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Mobility, Notoriety, and Crime: A Study in the Crime Patterns of Urban Nodal Points , 1981 .

[5]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A general theory of crime. , 1992 .

[6]  William Spelman,et al.  Calling the police : citizen reporting of serious crime , 1984 .

[7]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[8]  D. Farrington,et al.  Understanding and controlling crime , 1986 .

[9]  Joan R. Petersilia Implementing Randomized Experiments , 1989 .

[10]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[11]  P. Lachenbruch,et al.  Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. , 1989 .

[12]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[13]  Thomas Gabor,et al.  Crime Displacement and Situational Prevention: Toward the Development of Some Principles , 1990 .

[14]  L. Sherman,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing , 2009 .

[15]  Albert Gore,et al.  Putting People First: How We Can All Change America , 1992 .

[16]  R. Clarke Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies , 1992 .

[17]  Jack R. Greene,et al.  Community Policing and the Rule of Law , 1993 .

[18]  Gail Mason,et al.  Design Sensitivity in Criminal Justice Experiments , 1993, Crime and Justice.

[19]  L. Sherman,et al.  Why Crime Control is Not Reactionary , 1993 .

[20]  Glenn L. Pierce,et al.  REEXAMINING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY USING CALLS TO THE POLICE AS A MEASURE OF CRIME , 1993 .

[21]  S. Walker Historical Roots of the Legal Control of Police Behavior , 1993 .

[22]  Analyse spatiale des crimes commis sur la rue a l'interieur des marches de drogues [Spatial analysis of crimes committed in street-level drug markets] , 1994 .

[23]  David H. Bayley,et al.  Police for the Future , 1994 .

[24]  David Weisburd,et al.  Measuring immediate spatial displacement : Methodological issues and problems , 1995 .

[25]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial , 1995 .

[26]  L. Green,et al.  Cleaning up drug hot spots in Oakland, California: The displacement and diffusion effects , 1995 .