Modeling of catalyst layer microstructural refinement and catalyst utilization in a PEM fuel cell

Abstract Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance is largely controlled by the microstructure of the catalyst layer. Hence, a need exists to develop fundamental understanding of the effect of catalyst layer microstructure on a PEM fuel cell operational characteristics. Significant obstacles to commercialization of a PEM fuel cell have been attributed to high cost of the platinum catalyst, slow kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and low catalyst utilization. In order to address these limiting factors, a model has been developed to investigate the effect of catalyst particle size, loading, utilization and distribution of catalyst layer components. The model predicts a large increase in the exchange current and in cell potential following a corresponding reduction in activation polarization as catalyst particle size decreases to a few nanometers. Model predictions compare well with published experimental data. The model also predicts an upper statistical limit of 22% to the amount of catalyst that can be utilized for current generation, even for best-prepared catalyst layer. This explains the observed low catalyst utilization (

[1]  A. Gebert,et al.  Cathodes for chlorate electrolysis with nanocrystalline Ti–Ru–Fe–O catalyst , 2000 .

[2]  Sanjeev Mukerjee,et al.  Investigation of Enhanced CO Tolerance in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells by Carbon Supported PtMo Alloy Catalyst , 1999 .

[3]  A. A. Kornyshev,et al.  Modelling the performance of the cathode catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 1998 .

[4]  Ralph E. White,et al.  A water and heat management model for proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells , 1993 .

[5]  J. C. Amphlett Performance Modeling of the Ballard Mark IV Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1995 .

[6]  J. C. Amphlett,et al.  Performance modeling of the Ballard Mark IV solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell. II: Empirical model development , 1995 .

[7]  G. Squadrito,et al.  Nafion content in the catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells: effects on structure and performance , 2001 .

[8]  Jingrong Yu,et al.  Investigation of platinum utilization and morphology in catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 1999 .

[9]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Composition and performance modelling of catalyst layer in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 1999 .

[10]  Z. Farhat,et al.  Effect of grain size on friction and wear of nanocrystalline aluminum , 1996 .

[11]  D. Guay,et al.  Effect of carbon-containing compounds on the hydriding behavior of nanocrystalline Mg2Ni , 2000 .

[12]  R. Hempelmann,et al.  New preparation technique and characterisation of nanostructured catalysts for polymer membrane fuel cells , 2001 .

[13]  J. Huot,et al.  Large specific surface area nanocrystalline Ti–Ru–Fe cathode materials for sodium chlorate , 1999 .

[14]  Hiroyuki Uchida,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Membranes Incorporated with Nanometer-Size Particles of Pt and/or Metal-Oxides: Experimental Analysis of the Self-Humidification and Suppression of Gas-Crossover in Fuel Cells , 1998 .

[15]  T. Fuller,et al.  Water and Thermal Management in Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 1993 .

[16]  C. Chamberlin,et al.  Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance with an Empirical Equation , 1995 .

[17]  Jean St-Pierre,et al.  Low Cost Electrodes for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Performance in Single Cells and Ballard Stacks , 1997 .

[18]  Xianghuai Liu,et al.  Preparation and properties of nanocrystalline (Fe0.99Mo0.01)78Si9B13 alloys , 1993 .

[19]  J. H. Lee,et al.  Modeling electrochemical performance in large scale proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks , 1998 .

[20]  T. Springer,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model , 1991 .

[21]  Edward A. Kenik,et al.  Rapid Synthesis of a Pt1Ru1/Carbon Nanocomposite Using Microwave Irradiation: A DMFC Anode Catalyst of High Relative Performance , 2001 .

[22]  D. G. Morris,et al.  Microstructure and strength of nanocrystalline copper alloy prepared by mechanical alloying , 1991 .

[23]  L. Roué,et al.  XPS surface study of nanocrystalline Ti Ru Fe materials , 2000 .

[24]  Brant A. Peppley,et al.  On board hydrogen purification for steam reformation/ PEM fuel cell vehicle power plants , 1996 .

[25]  James McBreen,et al.  Voltammetric Studies of Electrodes in Contact with Ionomeric Membranes , 1985 .

[26]  Mark W. Verbrugge,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1992 .

[27]  Sanjeev Mukerjee,et al.  Effects of Nafion impregnation on performances of PEMFC electrodes , 1998 .

[28]  Pierre R. Roberge,et al.  Development and application of a generalised steady-state electrochemical model for a PEM fuel cell , 2000 .

[29]  Hongtan Liu,et al.  A parametric study of the cathode catalyst layer of PEM fuel cells using a pseudo-homogeneous model , 2001 .

[30]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode bonded to a polymer electrolyte , 1991 .

[31]  V. Antonucci,et al.  Chemical and morphological characterization of a direct methanol fuel cell based on a quaternary Pt-Ru-Sn-W/C anode , 1996 .

[32]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .