Envy-Free Pricing in Multi-unit Markets

We study the envy-free pricing problem in multi-unit markets with budgets, where there is a seller who brings multiple units of an item, while several buyers bring monetary endowments (budgets). Our goal is to compute an envy-free (item) price and allocation---i.e. an outcome where all the demands of the buyers are met given their budget constraints---which additionally achieves a desirable objective. We analyze markets with linear valuations, where the buyers are price takers and price makers, respectively. For the price taking scenario, we provide a polynomial time algorithm for computing the welfare maximizing envy-free pricing, followed by an FPTAS and exact algorithm---that is polynomial for a constant number of types of buyers---for computing a revenue maximizing envy-free pricing. In the price taking model, where the buyers can strategize, we show a general impossibility of designing strategyproof and efficient mechanisms even with public budgets. On the positive side, we provide an optimal strategyproof mechanism for common budgets that simultaneously approximates the maximal revenue and welfare within a factor of 2 on all markets except monopsonies. Finally, for markets with general valuations in the price taking scenario, we provide hardness results for computing envy-free pricing schemes that maximize revenue and welfare, as well as fully polynomial time approximation schemes for both problems.

[1]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[2]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic commerce , 2007, EC 2010.

[3]  Ning Chen,et al.  How Profitable Are Strategic Behaviors in a Market? , 2011, ESA.

[4]  László A. Végh,et al.  To Save Or Not To Save: The Fisher Game , 2014, WINE.

[5]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Item pricing for revenue maximization , 2008, EC '08.

[6]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Multi-unit Auctions with Budget Limits , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  Faruk Gul,et al.  WALRASIAN EQUILIBRIUM WITH GROSS SUBSTITUTES , 1999 .

[8]  Eugene L. Lawler,et al.  Fast approximation algorithms for knapsack problems , 1977, 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1977).

[9]  Simina Brânzei,et al.  Characterization and Computation of Equilibria for Indivisible Goods , 2015, SAGT.

[10]  Eugene L. Lawler,et al.  Parameterized Approximation Scheme for the Multiple Knapsack Problem , 2009, SIAM J. Comput..

[11]  Amos Fiat,et al.  The Invisible Hand of Dynamic Market Pricing , 2015, EC.

[12]  Yang Cai,et al.  Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization: Approximation Algorithms and other Generalizations , 2013, SODA.

[13]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  The Complexity of Fairness Through Equilibrium , 2013, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[14]  Eric Budish,et al.  The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Edith Cohen,et al.  Truth, Envy, and Truthful Market Clearing Bundle Pricing , 2011, WINE.

[16]  Léon Walras Éléments d'économie politique pure, ou, Théorie de la richesse sociale , 1976 .

[17]  Ning Chen,et al.  Envy-free pricing in multi-item markets , 2014, TALG.

[18]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  On the efficiency of the walrasian mechanism , 2013, EC.

[19]  Lawrence M. Ausubel An Efficient Ascending-Bid Auction for Multiple Objects , 2004 .

[20]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Revenue maximizing envy-free multi-unit auctions with budgets , 2012, EC '12.

[21]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Multi-unit auctions: beyond roberts , 2010, EC '11.

[22]  Shreyas Sekar,et al.  Posted Pricing sans Discrimination , 2016, IJCAI.

[23]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Revenue Maximization Envy-Free Pricing for Homogeneous Resources , 2015, IJCAI.

[24]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders , 2005, EC '05.

[25]  Piotr Sankowski,et al.  Revenue Maximizing Envy-Free Fixed-Price Auctions with Budgets , 2014, WINE.

[26]  M. Petersen,et al.  Information: Hard and Soft , 2018, The Review of Corporate Finance Studies.

[27]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Envy, truth, and profit , 2011, EC '11.

[28]  H. Scarf,et al.  How to Compute Equilibrium Prices in 1891 , 2005 .

[29]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  Envy-Free Revenue Approximation for Asymmetric Buyers with Budgets , 2016, SAGT.

[30]  Phillip E. Pfeifer,et al.  Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance , 2010 .

[31]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  The Optimal Mechanism for Selling to a Budget Constrained Buyer: The General Case , 2017, EC.

[32]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Price Stickiness and Customer Antagonism , 2008 .

[33]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Mechanisms for multi-unit auctions , 2007, EC '07.

[34]  Piotr Krysta,et al.  Single-minded unlimited supply pricing on sparse instances , 2006, SODA '06.

[35]  Jason D. Hartline Mechanism Design and Approximation , 2014 .

[36]  Simina Brânzei,et al.  The Fisher Market Game: Equilibrium and Welfare , 2014, AAAI.

[37]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing , 2005, SODA '05.

[38]  Michal Feldman,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions via Posted Prices , 2014, SODA.

[39]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  Efficiency Guarantees in Auctions with Budgets , 2013, ICALP.

[40]  Allan Borodin,et al.  Budgetary Effects on Pricing Equilibrium in Online Markets , 2016, AAMAS.

[41]  R. Mehta,et al.  Exchange Markets : Strategy meets Supply-Awareness , 2013 .

[42]  Hendrik W. Lenstra,et al.  Integer Programming with a Fixed Number of Variables , 1983, Math. Oper. Res..

[43]  Ruta Mehta,et al.  Exchange Markets: Strategy Meets Supply-Awareness - (Abstract) , 2013, WINE.

[44]  K. Arrow,et al.  EXISTENCE OF AN EQUILIBRIUM FOR A COMPETITIVE ECONOMY , 1954 .

[45]  Yang Cai,et al.  Optimal Multi-dimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[46]  Chaitanya Swamy,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Single-minded Envy-free Profit-maximization Problems with Limited Supply , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[47]  V. Crawford,et al.  Job Matching, Coalition Formation, and Gross Substitutes , 1982 .

[48]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Simple versus optimal mechanisms , 2009, SECO.

[49]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Incentive compatible multi unit combinatorial auctions , 2003, TARK '03.