Up-to-dateness of reviews is often neglected in overviews: a systematic review.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dawid Pieper | Edmund A M Neugebauer | Michaela Eikermann | D. Pieper | M. Eikermann | E. Neugebauer | Sunya-Lee Antoine | Sunya-Lee Antoine
[1] Benjamin Djulbegovic,et al. Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma: An Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2010, Acta Haematologica.
[2] L. Monasta,et al. Early-life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews , 2011 .
[3] Monika Mierzwinski-Urban,et al. A pragmatic critical appraisal instrument for search filters: introducing the CADTH CAI. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.
[4] Howard Balshem,et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[5] W. Gaus. Anmerkungen zum Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG) , 2006 .
[6] C. Cates,et al. Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in children with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[7] Aneesa Motala,et al. Assessment of the Need to Update Comparative Effectiveness Reviews , 2009 .
[8] H. Buchwald,et al. Evolution of Operative Procedures for the Management of Morbid Obesity 1950-2000 , 2002, Obesity surgery.
[9] Jennifer S. Lin,et al. Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[10] D. Pieper,et al. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[11] Ethan M Balk,et al. Identifying Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews: A Comparison of Two Methods , 2011 .
[12] J. Grimshaw,et al. When and how to update systematic reviews. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[13] D. Cook,et al. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[14] G H Guyatt,et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[15] K. Shojania,et al. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[16] G. Guyatt,et al. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[17] Dawid Pieper,et al. Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[18] Dawid Pieper,et al. State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviews. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[19] J. Brug,et al. Early‐life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews , 2010, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.
[20] Ethan M Balk,et al. Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[21] David Moher,et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.
[22] L. Hemkens,et al. Benefit assessment of salt reduction in patients with hypertension: systematic overview , 2011, Journal of hypertension.
[23] R. Aggarwal,et al. Volume-Outcome Association in Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2012, Annals of surgery.
[24] David Moher,et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[25] Ingvild Kjeken,et al. There Is Inadequate Evidence to Determine the Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological and Nonsurgical Interventions for Hand Osteoarthritis: An Overview of High-Quality Systematic Reviews , 2009, Physical Therapy.
[26] David Moher,et al. A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews , 2012, PloS one.
[27] Denise Thomson,et al. The evolution of a new publication type: Steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews , 2010, Research synthesis methods.
[28] H. Bastian,et al. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? , 2010, PLoS medicine.