Multicenter phase II study of weekly oral vinorelbine for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE We initiated a large multicenter phase II trial in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate the activity and safety of an oral gelatin-based formation of vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-three centers participated in this uncontrolled phase II study, which accrued patients between August 1991 and March 1992. Eligible patients had previously untreated measurable or assessable stage IV NSCLC, age more than 18 years, and Karnofsky performance status > or = 70%. The treatment plan initially was to administer 100 mg/m2/wk of oral vinorelbine or 80 mg/m2/wk for patients who had received prior radiation therapy. After the observation of grade IV granulocytopenia in six of the first 25 patients, subsequent doses were reduced by 40 mg (one capsule) in all patients. RESULTS One hundred sixty-two patients were treated: 138 with measurable and 24 with assessable disease. One hundred two patients were men and 60 women. The mean age was 62 years (range, 36 to 83). The overall response rate was 14.5% for patients with measurable disease (95% confidence interval, 9.3% to 21.7%). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) for all patients was 9 weeks. The median survival time was 29 weeks; the 1-year survival rate was 22%. Toxicities included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 40%, which was dependent on the vinorelbine dose. Other toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The mean dose intensity of vinorelbine was 53 mg/m2. CONCLUSION Oral vinorelbine administered once weekly is an active agent in stage IV NSCLC. The median survival time of 29 weeks is similar to that achieved with single-agent intravenous vinorelbine and more aggressive cisplatin-based combinations. Further studies of this compound in the palliative-intent care setting appear to be indicated.

[1]  F. Invernizzi,et al.  Chemotherapy vs supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Results of a meta-analysis of the literature. , 1994, Chest.

[2]  P Chomy,et al.  Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  A. Oxman,et al.  Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how much benefit is enough? , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  S. Kaasa,et al.  Polychemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis , 1993, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Green,et al.  Novel chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  T. Delozier,et al.  Phase II trial of weekly intravenous vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G Cartei,et al.  Cisplatin-cyclophosphamide-mitomycin combination chemotherapy with supportive care versus supportive care alone for treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  J. Crowley,et al.  Evaluation of cisplatin intensity in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III study of the Southwest Oncology Group. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Grever,et al.  New chemotherapeutic agents in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1993, Seminars in oncology.

[10]  J. Herndon,et al.  Intravenous 6-thioguanine or cisplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of the cancer and leukemia group B. , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  E. Quoix,et al.  [Is chemotherapy with cisplatin useful in non small cell bronchial cancer at staging IV? Results of a randomized study]. , 1991, Bulletin du cancer.

[12]  D. Finkelstein,et al.  Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  R. Holle,et al.  Experience of a German multicenter study group with ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer. , 1989, Seminars in oncology.

[14]  J L Pater,et al.  Chemotherapy can prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer--report of a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  K. Propert,et al.  Carboplatin or iproplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. , 1987, Cancer treatment reports.

[16]  D. Ettinger,et al.  A randomized trial of the four most active regimens for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M Lavandier,et al.  Benefits of polychemotherapy in advanced non‐small‐cell bronchogenic carcinoma , 1982, Cancer.