Preventive Impella® Support in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Background: Patients with severely reduced LV-EF ≤ 30% undergoing CABG have a high risk for postoperative cardiogenic shock. The optimal timing of an adequate hemodynamic support has an impact on short- and midterm mortality after CABG. This study aimed to assess the prophylactic use of the Impella pump in high-risk patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 14 patients with LV-EF (≤30%) undergoing cardiac surgery received a prophylactic, perioperative Impella (5.0, 5.5) support between 2020 and 2022. Results: The mean age at surgery was 64.2 ± 2.6 years, the mean preoperative LV-EF was 20.7% ± 1.56%. The duration of Impella support was 4 (3–7.8) days and the 30-day survival rate was 92.85%. Acute renal failure occurred in four patients who were dialyzed on average for 1.2 ± 0.7 days. Mechanical ventilation was needed for 1.75 (0.9–2.7) days. Time to inotrope/vasopressor independence was 2 (0.97–7.25) days with a highest lactate level (24 h postoperatively) of 3.8 ± 0.6 mmol/l. Postoperative LV-EF showed a significant improvement when compared to preoperative LV-EF (29.1% ± 2.6% vs. 20.7% ± 1.56% (p = 0.022)). Conclusion: The prophylactic Impella application seems to be a safe approach to improve the outcomes of this patient population.

[1]  A. Truesdell,et al.  Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis. , 2022, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  A. Kaki,et al.  A Review of the Impella Devices , 2022, Interventional cardiology.

[3]  S. Janssens,et al.  Managing Patients With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: JACC Review Topic of the Week. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Levosimendan in patients with reduced left ventricular function undergoing isolated coronary or valve surgery. , 2020, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  S. Prasad,et al.  Direct right ventricular Impella LD implantation enables postoperative ambulation and may avoid sternal re‐entry , 2020, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[6]  A. Mebazaa,et al.  Levosimendan in the light of the results of the recent randomized controlled trials: an expert opinion paper , 2019, Critical Care.

[7]  Ri Sho,et al.  The use of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  A. Galloway,et al.  Concomitant temporary mechanical support in high‐risk coronary artery bypass surgery , 2019, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[9]  P. Leprince,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 and the Impella Left Direct pumps for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. , 2019, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  H. Reichenspurner,et al.  A newly developed transaortic axial flow ventricular assist device: Early clinical experience. , 2019, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[11]  J. van der Linden,et al.  Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy shock: Risk factors for mortality , 2018, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  J. Ali,et al.  Mechanical support for high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting , 2018, Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[13]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Effect of Levosimendan on Low Cardiac Output Syndrome in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: The LICORN Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[14]  A. Pershad,et al.  A retrospective analysis of Impella use in all‐comers: 1‐year outcomes , 2017, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[15]  M. Monaco,et al.  Successful use of the Impella Recover LP 5.0 device for circulatory support during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting , 2014, International journal of surgery case reports.

[16]  O. Frazier,et al.  Impella Recover 5.0 Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 2010, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[17]  H. Yerebakan,et al.  First Turkish experiences of assisted beating-heart coronary artery bypass graft with the Impella Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device. , 2010, Heart Surgery Forum.

[18]  N. Doll,et al.  Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  M. Oz,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction , 2005, Circulation.

[20]  M. Farkouh,et al.  Preoperative Intraaortic Balloon Pump Improves Early Outcomes Following High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Prospective Study Design. , 2018, The Journal of invasive cardiology.