A conceptual paper on novelty detection for temporal data using level set methods

The process of mining comprises of supervised learning and unsupervised learning. It includes various approaches out of which data classification is one of the beneficial and constructive methods. This paper explores the effective functioning of the whole process. There are several cases in classification where the important data is missed during the process. It can hence be concluded that the process of mining is greatly affected by the absence of such kind of data. The process of extraction of unknown and new data from the huge dataset that has been left during the classification process is known as novelty detection. It aims to cover the most commonly used ideas in modeling the novelty data, to classify them as well as to provide useful methods which need to be used in order to identify novelty data for temporal data time series. Novelty detection generally focuses on the identification of shapes or patterns, space, density, distance and learning models. This paper mainly aims to identify the important data which is typically missed during the process of training. This research explains the overall concept to detect the novelty data that is used in the taxonomy of level set methods.

[1]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  A Novel Density-Based Clustering Framework by Using Level Set Method , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  Cecilia Surace,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: A negative selection approach , 2010 .

[3]  Ammar Belatreche,et al.  Novelty Detection Using Level Set Methods , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[4]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[5]  Wenkai Li,et al.  A Positive and Unlabeled Learning Algorithm for One-Class Classification of Remote-Sensing Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Jung-Min Park,et al.  An overview of anomaly detection techniques: Existing solutions and latest technological trends , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Victoria J. Hodge,et al.  A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[8]  Plamen P. Angelov,et al.  Autonomous novelty detection and object tracking in video streams using evolving clustering and Takagi-Sugeno type neuro-fuzzy system , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[9]  Martin K. Purvis,et al.  Novelty detection in wildlife scenes through semantic context modelling , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Xiongcai Cai,et al.  Level Learning Set: A Novel Classifier Based on Active Contour Models , 2007, ECML.

[11]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 2: : neural network based approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[12]  Ian M. Mitchell.  The Flexible, Extensible and Efficient Toolbox of Level Set Methods , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[13]  Marius Kloft,et al.  Toward Supervised Anomaly Detection , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[14]  VARUN CHANDOLA,et al.  Anomaly detection: A survey , 2009, CSUR.

[15]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Anomaly Detection and Characterization in Spatial Time Series Data: A Cluster-Centric Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.